CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive landscape of real estate development, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homebuyers. This blog post provides a detailed review of 1 Address Infrastructures Private Limited, a builder currently engaged in projects within Punjab. We will analyze their legal history, particularly focusing on any complaints, cases won, and cases lost, to give potential buyers a clearer picture of what to expect.
1 Address Infrastructures Private Limited operates with an established presence in Punjab. However, prospective buyers may want to consider the builder’s legal history, which appears to be a vital factor in making an informed decision.
From the available data, 1 Address Infrastructures Private Limited showcases a concerning legal profile with one complaint leading to a case loss and no cases won. For potential buyers, this raises red flags regarding the builder's reliability and capacity to handle customer grievances. While the company has undertaken projects in Punjab, the absence of a strong legal backing could influence buyer confidence.
In summary, while 1 Address Infrastructures Private Limited has a presence in Punjab, their legal track record does not inspire confidence in potential buyers. It is paramount for buyers to be diligent in their research and consider the risks involved when dealing with a builder exhibiting such a legal profile. By taking proactive measures and following the tips discussed, buyers can place themselves in a stronger position when deciding on their future home.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Address Infrastructures Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, project delay disputes, and regulatory compliance issues.
Many of the cases involve delays in delivering possession of properties to buyers, leading to claims of inadequate fulfillment of contractual obligations. Buyers often contest penalties imposed for these delays, arguing that the builder failed to provide timely notice or valid reasons for the extensions. This highlights a pattern where buyers perceive builders as accountable for meeting deadlines and fulfilling promises of timely delivery.
Project delay disputes revolve around the builder's attributions of blame to other parties involved in the project, such as contractors, municipal authorities, or buyers themselves. Common reasons for these disputes include misunderstandings over project classification, failure to secure necessary approvals, and changes in regulatory requirements. The builder's defense often centers around a lack of control over external factors, yet this has not resonated with the courts.
The third theme encompasses regulatory compliance issues, including non-compliance with municipal orders, zoning regulations, and other legal requirements. Cases within this theme often involve the builder's failure to adhere to established norms, which has resulted in legal ramifications. Buyers and authorities alike have expressed concerns over the builder's adherence to regulations, highlighting the importance of transparency and compliance in real estate ventures.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and a lack of accountability for project delays. The courts have generally sided with buyers and authorities, indicating a need for builders to take responsibility for their actions, fulfill obligations, and respect regulatory frameworks. Understanding these patterns is crucial for potential buyers who must make informed decisions before investing in properties developed by Address Infrastructures Private Limited.