CIN | U70100DL2010PTC210404 |
---|---|
Year Established | 13 November 2010 |
Address | 711/92, DEEPALI, NEHRU PLACE , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110019 |
Company Status | Private |
When it comes to choosing the right builder for your dream home, understanding their reputation and reliability is paramount. In this blog post, we'll delve into the case history of 1000 Trees Housing Private Limited, a builder operating in Haryana, and analyze their performance through the lens of their legal encounters.
1000 Trees Housing Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which resulted in lost cases for the builder. The cases centered around issues of delayed possession of flats, with complainants alleging they had made substantial financial commitments of Rs. 58,14,613/- without receiving the promised property within the stipulated timeframe of 42 months.
In each case, the complainants claimed that despite timely payments, they faced significant delays in possession. The builder, in turn, attributed these delays to circumstances beyond their control, citing global recession impacts and local authority issues. Ultimately, the verdict mandated the builder to either refund the amount paid with interest or provide an alternative property to the buyers.
The consistent theme in the cases lost by 1000 Trees Housing revolves around a failure to deliver properties within agreed timelines. Each complainant indicated a similar grievance, highlighting a potential trend in operational inefficiencies within the company, particularly concerning project management and timelines.
While the data reflects the builder's loss in both cases, it's worth noting that the final verdicts involved directives that offered buyers compensation or alternative remedies. This indicates an awareness by the builder of their accountability and a willingness to address customer grievances through restitution, even though they were officially classified as losses.
Based on the provided legal data, 1000 Trees Housing Private Limited presents a mixed picture. The complaints indicate serious issues with project delivery timelines, raising red flags for potential buyers. Although the builder has engaged in remedial actions post-complaints, the lack of won cases underscores concerns about their reliability and operational practices.
In summary, while 1000 Trees Housing Private Limited has engaged with buyers post-complaint, potential home buyers should approach with caution and ensure they are well-informed about the risks involved.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against 1000 Trees Housing Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, with the complainants alleging that the builder failed to deliver possession of flats within the agreed-upon time frame of 42 months, despite being paid a significant amount of Rs. 58,14,613/-.
The builder consistently defended these claims by attributing the delays to circumstances beyond their control, such as the global recession and issues with local authorities. However, the authority did not accept this defense and directed the builder to either offer an alternate property or refund the amount paid with interest. This highlights a significant shortcoming in the builder's project management and their accountability for meeting timelines.
The common trigger for these legal disputes is the builder’s inability to fulfill their contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely possession. People brought cases to court primarily because they were aggrieved by the delays and the builder’s failure to provide a clear resolution or alternative solutions in a timely manner.
The builder lost these cases largely due to their inability to convince the authority that the delays were genuinely caused by unforeseen circumstances. The repeated failure to meet deadlines without valid reasons accepted by the courts resulted in legal consequences, emphasizing the importance of transparency and adherence to contractual timelines in real estate transactions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
730/2018 | Haryana | Complainant Abhishek Gupta filed a complaint agai… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Neha Gupta | Thousand Trees Hous… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NTkzNA== |