No Logo Available

2.9 GROUP

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction to 2.9 Group

In the ever-evolving landscape of the real estate market in Gujarat, choosing the right builder can be a daunting task for potential homebuyers. One such builder, 2.9 Group, has garnered attention due to its limited yet intriguing legal history. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's case records to understand their performance and how it may impact your purchase decision.

Overview of 2.9 Group

Name: 2.9 Group
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Insights

Summary of Legal Cases

A detailed examination of the builder's legal history reveals one notable case. In this instance, the complainant sought possession of a flat along with compensation for delays in delivery. The response from 2.9 Group indicated that the construction was still in progress, and they anticipated handing over possession soon. However, the authority ruled against 2.9 …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Compensation for Delay Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder 2.9 Group, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, compensation for delays, and penalties imposed for project delays.

The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time, leading complainants to seek both immediate possession and financial compensation for the prolonged wait. For instance, in one significant case, the complainant sought possession of a flat and compensation for the delay, while the builder contended that construction was ongoing and that possession would be granted soon. However, the authority ruled against the builder, ordering them to hand over possession within three months and to pay interest at varying rates from the date of the initial complaint until the actual possession date.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court included …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review