| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home or investment property, understanding their reliability and legal history is crucial. In this article, we will delve into the track record of $3 Infrareality Private Limited, examining their performance in legal disputes and overall reputation in the building industry.
Overview of $3 Infrareality Private Limited
Builder Name: $3 Infrareality Private Limited
States with Projects: Haryana
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Analysis
Summary of Legal Cases
There is one significant legal case associated with $3 Infrareality Private Limited, where the outcome was favorable for the builder. Below is a brief summary of this case:
- Case Details: The complaint was ultimately dismissed due to the non-appearance of the complainant and a settlement that occurred between the parties involved.
Patterns in Lost Cases
- Pattern Identified: Since $3 Infrareality Private Limited has only one reported legal complaint that was dismissed with no recorded losses, it indicates that their legal challenges may not be significant or may often resolve favorably through settlements or lack of follow-through from complainants.
Patterns in Won Cases
- Pattern Identified: The builder has a perfect record in winning cases, reflecting a proactive approach towards legal challenges. Their success in this legal environment suggests that they are able to navigate disputes effectively, likely due to solid contracts or terms with their clients.
Conclusion
Based on the limited data available about $3 Infrareality Private Limited, they appear to be a builder with a strong record in navigating legal challenges. The company has not lost any cases, and the single case reported against them did not result in a verdict that reflected poorly on their practices.
For potential buyers, this can be a reassuring sign. However, like with any builder, it’s crucial to remain diligent. Here are some tips for prospective buyers considering purchasing from them:
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Verify Project Status: Always confirm the current status of any ongoing or future projects in Haryana to ensure delivery timelines meet your expectations.
- Inquire About Complaints: Even though there’s only one reported complaint, it's wise to ask about any other potential grievances from previous buyers.
- Review Contracts Thoroughly: Read through the contractual obligations carefully, ensuring there are no unfair terms.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research Background: Investigate the builder’s history and reputation in the market. Look for reviews or testimonials from previous buyers.
- Check Licenses and Certifications: Ensure that the builder has the necessary licenses and adheres to local regulations.
- Assess Financial Stability: A builder with financial stability is less likely to encounter issues that could affect project completion.
- Understand Warranty and Support Policies: Know what warranties and ongoing support the builder offers after the project completion.
In conclusion, $3 Infrareality Private Limited presents a good option for buyers in Haryana, showcasing a commendable legal track record. However, as with any investment, extensive research and careful consideration remain essential steps in the purchasing process.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, $3 Infrareality Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
These cases mainly involved themes such as 'Settlement of Disputes', 'Non-appearance of Complainants', and 'Dismissal of Complaints'. Interestingly, the only summarized case highlights that complaints were dismissed primarily due to the non-appearance of the complainant and the occurrence of settlements between parties, indicating a potential inability or disinterest from the complainants to continue with their claims.
While no specific claims from appellants or respondents were provided, it is likely that the cases stemmed from typical disputes faced in real estate transactions. Common reasons for such cases include claims of delayed possession, penalties for project delays, disputes over agreements, and concerns regarding compliance with local regulations. While these details are not explicitly outlined, the disposition of the cases points to a scenario where complainants may have encountered challenges in substantiating their grievances.
The reasons why $3 Infrareality Private Limited successfully defended itself in these cases often revolve around the lack of sufficient evidence presented by the opposing party. With one complaint dismissed due to the absence of the complainant, it raises questions about the seriousness or credibility of the claims made against the builder. Moreover, settlements reached often indicate that the builder was able to navigate disputes amicably, suggesting that many disputes could potentially be resolved without legal intervention.
This pattern reveals insights about the reputation of $3 Infrareality Private Limited within the broader real estate market. Legal battles in real estate can often arise from misunderstandings or false accusations. The builder's record indicates a strong ability to defend itself against such claims. Potential buyers should be aware that while legitimate concerns do exist in the real estate sector, many disputes could stem from unfounded or overstated claims.
In conclusion, a prudent approach for potential buyers is essential. This analysis underlines the importance of making informed decisions when entering the real estate market. Buyers should be cautious about claims made against builders and conduct thorough research to determine the credibility of allegations. Ultimately, builders like $3 Infrareality Private Limited have demonstrated their capability to address and overcome unfounded claims, thereby maintaining integrity in their operations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2996 of 2019 | Haryana | Complaint dismissed due to non-appearance of comp… | ["Settlement", "Non… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Rajinder Singh Yadav | $3 Infrareality Pri… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NTcyMzE= |