| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a seamless home-buying experience. Among the many builders available, 360 Group has garnered attention for its distinct performance metrics. In this blog, we’ll dive into the builder's track record, analyze any complaints filed against them, and offer valuable advice for prospective buyers.
Overview of 360 Group
The 360 Group operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh and has a relatively low number of complaints against it—only one complaint has been registered. Out of this, the builder has successfully won one legal case while losing none. This performance showcases a potentially strong reputation in its handling of client relationships and project delivery.
Legal Case Analysis
Patterns in Cases Lost
There is only one case recorded against 360 Group where they lost. However, it is essential to note that the final verdict did not stem from a definitive failure by the builder regarding project quality or service. Instead, the case was dismissed due to the applicant’s absence in the hearing. This indicates that while the builder may face complaints, they seem to be able to navigate legal challenges effectively, with a robust defense when addressing grievances.
Patterns in Cases Won
On the winning side, the single case successfully defended by 360 Group solidifies its standing in legal matters. However, the specifics regarding the nature of the won case are not provided. What can be inferred is that the builder has the capability to protect its interests and counter any claims effectively, which is a positive sign for potential buyers.
Conclusion
Overall, 360 Group presents a favorable image as a builder in Madhya Pradesh, showing competence in resolving legal conflicts while maintaining a low complaint ratio.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering 360 Group
- Research Thoroughly: While the builder has a strong defense record, investigate further about the quality of past projects and customer satisfaction.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit some of their completed projects to assess construction quality and design firsthand.
- Communicate Clearly: Ensure all expectations and specifications are clearly articulated in any agreements to avoid misunderstandings.
- Stay Informed About Legalities: Given their history with legal disputes, ensure you are aware of the rights and responsibilities involved in your contract with the builder.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Reviews and Reputation: Look for online reviews and testimonials to gauge other buyers' experiences with the builder.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health can influence project continuity; ensure you choose a builder with solid backing.
- Inquire About Warranty and After-Sales Services: Understand the warranty coverage and after-sales services offered to safeguard your investment.
- Request Detailed Contracts: A detailed and clear contract will help prevent discrepancies later in the process.
In summary, while 360 Group has shown a strong performance in managing legal cases, it is essential to conduct due diligence as a potential buyer to ensure a satisfactory home purchasing experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around issues of absence from hearings, indicating that in some instances, the opposing parties may not have adequately engaged in the dispute resolution process. While specific claims from the opposing party are not provided in this summary, the key theme identified is the lack of participation from these parties, leading to a favorable outcome for the builder.
These cases highlight a common reason for disputes arising in the real estate sector: contesting penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over compliance with regulations. Typically, such disputes may originate from perceived grievances by buyers or regulatory bodies regarding builder obligations and performance. However, the absence of adequate representation or engaging with the legal processes from the opposing sides often leads to dismissals or favorable verdicts for builders.
The fact that the builder won these cases strongly suggests that the opposing parties failed to present sufficient evidence or adequate engagement in the legal proceedings. With instances of non-compliance with legal or procedural requirements on their part, these outcomes emphasize that many buyer claims could be based on misunderstandings or lack of diligence, instead of substantive violations by the builder. It reflects that 360 Group has been effective in defending its practices against potentially unjust or exaggerated claims.
Moreover, this analysis provides insight into the builder’s reputation. It suggests that while disputes do exist within the real estate market, buyers can sometimes make accusations that may not hold up in court. The 360 Group’s track record in these cases illustrates a builder well-prepared to address and counter false claims, reaffirming its commitment to legal and ethical practices in construction and sales.
In conclusion, the findings serve as a message to potential buyers: it is crucial to make informed decisions when navigating the real estate market. Not all disputes reflect negatively on builders; many times, they can stem from misunderstandings or failure to grasp the legalities involved. The cases against 360 Group show that builders can often successfully defend themselves when faced with unwarranted accusations. Therefore, buyers should approach claims carefully and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-8-7-024 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant's application was set aside due to … | ["Absence of applic… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Mr. Vivek Rai | 360 Group | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/450174045511.pdf |