| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the complex world of real estate, prospective buyers often need to navigate through builders' reputations, project timelines, and legal standings. One such builder is 4 S.V.S. Buildcon Private Limited, which operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh. This article provides an analysis of this builder’s legal track record, along with recommendations for potential buyers.
Company Overview
4 S.V.S. Buildcon Private Limited has managed to complete projects in Madhya Pradesh but is currently facing scrutiny due to its legal history. With one complaint registered against them, the builder has encountered a case loss, which raises questions about their operational integrity and customer service.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
The sole case against 4 S.V.S. Buildcon Private Limited highlights a significant issue regarding project delivery. In this matter, the applicant alleged that the builder delayed possession of a flat and sought compensation. The adjudicating officer ultimately ruled against the …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against 4 S.V.S. Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with the applicant seeking compensation for the builder's failure to deliver properties on time.
The builder consistently attributed these delays to circumstances beyond their control, a defense that was ultimately inadequate to prevent a loss in court. This highlights a pattern where the builder faced penalties due to an inability to fulfill contractual obligations, leading to legal consequences such as the repayment of consideration amounts inclusive of interest and compensation.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases included contesting the builder's failure to provide timely possession and disputing the builder's contention that the delays were caused by unforeseen circumstances. The decision by the adjudicating officer indicates a lack of acceptance of this defense, suggesting that the builder's evidence was insufficient …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!