CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering any real estate investment, understanding the builder’s reputation and past performance is crucial. Today, we dive into an analysis of 70 Realty, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. With a very limited history of complaints and legal cases, it’s important for prospective buyers to scrutinize what the available data reveals.
Builder Name: 70 Realty
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat
The legal landscape surrounding 70 Realty includes:
In this instance, 70 Realty lost its only legal case due to failure to comply with regulatory reporting requirements. The case highlights a potential lack of oversight or knowledge of legal obligations related to real estate development. The authority’s decision indicates an expectation for builders to be informed of, and adhere to, laws governing their operations. Given this, any future buyers may want to be cautious about the builder’s administrative practices and legal compliance.
Interestingly, 70 Realty has not won any cases to date; all claims have resulted in losses against them. This presents a pattern indicating that the builder may need to improve its approach to handling projects and legal obligations, as consistent victories are ideal for establishing trust with clients.
Overall, the data surrounding 70 Realty suggests that potential buyers should proceed with caution. The single legal complaint resulting in a loss and a significant penalty reflects poorly on the builder's oversight of legal commitments. Buyers considering purchasing from 70 Realty should be vigilant about verifying the builder’s compliance with all necessary regulations and their commitment to maintaining transparency going forward.
In summary, while 70 Realty has operated with limited historical performance, it’s crucial for prospective buyers to exercise due diligence before making any investment decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder 70 Realty, which it lost, revealed several key points across the board. The disputes can primarily be categorized into two main themes: non-compliance with the RERA Act and rules, and penalties incurred due to late reporting of necessary documentation.
In the case of non-compliance, the builder was found to have violated the provisions set forth by the RERA Act by failing to submit quarterly reports on time. This raises a broader concern about the builder's adherence to regulatory standards and their potential implications on the projects they undertake.
The penalties for late reporting serve as a direct consequence of the builder’s non-compliance. Courts imposed fines in an effort to enforce responsibility and timely fulfillment of obligations. In one notable case, the builder was penalized with a fine of Rs. 50,000, which underscores the legal system's commitment to ensuring that builders uphold their duties.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included the builder's failure to adhere to required reporting schedules and their lack of awareness regarding legal standards. This ignorance of the law led to preventable violations and resultant litigation, indicating a significant pattern wherein builders may not fully comprehend their obligations, leading to legal entanglements.
The builder's losses in these cases primarily stemmed from their insufficient defense, which often revolved around claims of ignorance rather than valid legal grounds. This highlights the importance for builders to familiarize themselves with the RERA Act and other relevant regulations to avoid similar outcomes in the future.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCQR-217/2018 | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority impo… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | 70 Realty | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=168WxflGK3IEpHPWLeW5Awc1nl0X3QAtx |