| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to real estate and property development, selecting the right builder is a pivotal decision for prospective homeowners. Today, we explore the track record of A.A.A. Reality, a builder operating in Gujarat, examining their complaint history, legal challenges, and the implications for potential buyers.
Overview of Builder's Performance
A.A.A. Reality has faced a total of two complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. Despite this, the builder did win certain procedural aspects in previously filed cases, showcasing a somewhat mixed but predominantly unfavorable track record.
Legal Case Details
A close examination of the cases against A.A.A. Reality reveals that complainants alleged significant issues concerning the quality of facilities provided in the Sadarhu scheme. The main concerns raised included:
- Defective Facilities: The complaints highlighted inadequate parking spaces and defective paver blocks.
- Inadequate Infrastructure: The lack of a proper drainage system was a core grievance.
While the builder attempted to contest the complaints by asserting that the appellants had no right to file them, the authority ultimately directed A.A.A. Reality to address the identified defects, mandating the completion of repairs within a stipulated timeframe.
Patterns in Legal Cases
Patterns in Cases Won
Interestingly, in the instances where the builder had a procedural victory (noted mistakes in complaint procedures), the essence of the grievances remained unchanged, suggesting that the fundamental issues related to the quality of work had not been resolved through these minor legal victories.
Patterns in Cases Lost
The consistent trend of complaints revolving around defective facilities and inadequate services highlights a worrying pattern. The builder has not only failed to rectify these issues proactively but also lost both legal cases, suggesting potential neglect towards customer satisfaction and property maintenance.
Conclusion: What This Means for Potential Buyers
Evaluating A.A.A. Reality’s performance and complaints, it is evident that prospective homeowners should proceed with caution. Here are some key takeaways:
- Scrutiny of Complaints: The builder has a history of unresolved complaints, particularly regarding essential services like drainage and parking. Buyers must conduct thorough research and potentially seek feedback from current residents in A.A.A. Reality projects.
- Due Diligence: Before committing to a purchase, potential buyers should carefully review any documentation concerning the facilities and commitments made by the builder, including the status of any ongoing repairs or improvements mandated by authorities.
- Risk Awareness: Understanding the builder’s track record should play a vital role in decision-making. Buyers must consider the possibility of facing similar challenges post-purchase.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting a Builder
- Check for Reputation: Investigate other projects by the builder and seek verifiable testimonials.
- Review Legal History: Understanding a builder’s legal standing can provide insight into potential risks associated with property purchases.
- Request Transparency: Ensure that builders provide clear and comprehensive information regarding project timelines, warranty terms, and the quality of materials used.
By being informed and vigilant, potential buyers can mitigate risks and make sound decisions when choosing a builder like A.A.A. Reality.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.A.A. Reality, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common disputes faced by the builder. The cases highlighted a range of themes, predominantly revolving around claims of defective facilities provided in the Sadarhu scheme.
One of the most notable themes was the frequent mention of inadequate parking spaces. Complainants claimed that the promoter failed to provide sufficient parking, which is essential for homeowners. This theme overlaps with another common complaint regarding the lack of proper drainage systems, highlighting the builder's failure to ensure proper logistical and engineering planning in their projects.
The quality of construction materials was also a recurring concern, with complaints specifically detailing defective paver blocks. This raises questions about the builder's procurement practices and their adherence to quality standards, which is critical in ensuring the durability and safety of the properties developed.
The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that homeowners were primarily driven to court by the builder’s failure to deliver promised amenities and proper construction. The common triggers for litigation in these cases were not only the evident defects in facilities but also the builder's unfulfilled commitments, which led to dissatisfaction among residents.
The builder's defense consistently revolved around claims that the complainants lacked the right to file their grievances. However, the Authority partly allowed the complaints, signaling a failure on the builder's part to understand or acknowledge their obligations to homeowners. This suggests that one of the primary reasons for losing these cases was the builder's inability to meet regulatory requirements and fulfill their promises, coupled with a lack of substantial evidence to support their defense.
Overall, these cases shine a spotlight on the importance of vigilant quality control and adequate planning in real estate development. Buyers should take note of these litigations when considering properties managed by A.A.A. Reality, as they reflect potential risks regarding the quality of the living experience.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/OFC/AHMEDABAD/2… | Gujarat | The complainant filed a complaint against the pro… | ["Defective facilit… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Consumer Protection… | A.A.A. Reality | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1mratmfKNZpndUKkwy5wsZPoT0fxec3xg |