CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realms of real estate, AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED has carved a niche for itself in Uttar Pradesh. As with any builder, it’s critical for potential buyers to consider the builder’s legal track record and their overall reliability before making an investment.
When examining AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED through the lens of legal complaints, we find some interesting insights. The builder has one recorded complaint against it:
The single legal case against AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED revealed the following details:
The sole lost case for AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED suggests a concerning pattern:
Given these factors, potential buyers should be wary. A builder's consistence in appearing in legal matters often reflects their level of commitment to addressing client concerns and ensuring customer satisfaction.
Noteworthy is the detail surrounding the builder's one won case, which primarily focused on procedural matters rather than substantive defenses related to construction quality or contract fulfillment.
Overall, AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED presents a mixed picture. The lack of won cases and the single issue of a lost case without substantive defense points to a troubling aspect of their business operations.
In summary, while AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED might have projects in Uttar Pradesh, the legal challenges faced by the builder warrant careful consideration before engaging with them for your real estate needs.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Procedural Delays and Condonation.
The first type of dispute involves claims made by the appellants regarding delays in possession, which often cite unforeseen circumstances as a cause for late action. These cases typically revolve around the appellant's request for condonation of delay, as seen in the sole case summarized where the tribunal granted this request due to the absence of objections from the builder.
The common trigger for litigation in these instances appears to be a pattern of procedural mishandlings or inadequate responses from the builder, resulting in rulings that favor the appellants, particularly when the builder fails to put forth a defense or appear at hearings.
The reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases are strikingly similar. In each instance, the builder's lack of participation in the hearing, combined with a lack of evidence to counter the claims made, leads to a default verdict against them. Furthermore, this exposes a broader trend of non-compliance with legal procedures or a misunderstanding of their obligations, which can have significant implications for the builder's operational integrity and commitment to its clients.
Overall, these cases highlight the importance of proactive engagement in legal disputes and adherence to procedural requirements for builders like AADHAR INFRAHOLDING LIMITED. Buyers should take note of these patterns as they could indicate potential issues in dealing with this builder, especially concerning communication and accountability in the event of delays or discrepancies.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.