CIN | U70109DL2008PTC174131 |
---|---|
Year Established | 18-Feb-08 |
Address | House No.- C-1/2, Flat No.-3, Block-C, Ground Floor, Model Town New Delhi North Delhi DL 110009 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Aadinath Probuild (India) Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, has garnered attention in the real estate sector due to its unique track record in legal disputes. With a notable history of having won all four complaints filed against it, this builder presents a curious case study for potential buyers and investors. In this blog, we will delve into the specifics of the legal cases against Aadinath Probuild, identify patterns in the disputes, and provide guidance for prospective clients.
Despite having received four formal complaints, it's worth highlighting that Aadinath Probuild has successfully won each case. The complaints primarily centered around complaints of financial transactions, promises of possession timelines, and assertions of undisclosed fees. The issues raised in these legal disputes generally share a few common threads:
In stark contrast, Aadinath Probuild’s unbeaten record in these cases indicates some crucial strengths:
Overall, Aadinath Probuild (India) Private Limited presents a commendable track record in dealing with customer complaints, showcasing a remarkable ability to uphold its interests in the face of disputes. While the builder's success in winning all legal cases is impressive, potential buyers should navigate the real estate market with caution.
By taking an informed approach, potential buyers can mitigate risks and enhance their chances of a positive home-buying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Aadinath Probuild (India) Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases predominantly fall into three main themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes Over Payment Amounts, and Lack of Acknowledgment of Payments.
In the category of Delayed Possession Claims, numerous appellants argued that they were not provided possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timelines. However, in all instances, the builder successfully justified the delays, citing unforeseen circumstances and demonstrating that the appellants failed to establish their claims. Similarly, disputes over Payment Amounts highlighted contentions concerning the amounts paid by appellant parties. The builder effectively rebutted allegations of having received extra payments and showcased a lack of evidence from the appellants to back their claims.
Furthermore, many appellants sought refunds for amounts they claimed were paid in cash but were not acknowledged. The builder countered these allegations by asserting that transactions were either refunded or appropriately recorded, which the appellants could not substantiate.
A common pattern emerged from these cases, where appellants often cited project delays and demanded compensation, only to find their claims dismissed due to insufficient evidence or failure to follow necessary procedures. The builder's consistent victories in these legal disputes underline a strong capability to defend against what could be construed as unfounded or exaggerated claims from buyers.
This analysis reflects positively on Aadinath Probuild (India) Private Limited, indicating their resilience against potentially inaccurate accusations. It shows that while the real estate market does have its fare share of legitimate complaints, there are occasions where builders face unjustified claims from buyers.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions when venturing into real estate. While there are valid disputes within the industry, this analysis indicates that builders like Aadinath Probuild (India) Private Limited possess the means to robustly defend themselves against accusations that lack substantiation. Therefore, consumers should approach claims regarding builders with caution and conduct thorough research before drawing conclusions about their reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.