CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is a crucial step for potential homeowners and investors. One builder that has come under scrutiny is Aakar Infrastructure, which operates primarily in Gujarat. In this article, we will analyze the builder's legal standing, delve into any patterns observed in their court cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.
Aakar Infrastructure has faced one legal complaint to date, resulting in one lost case and, notably, no victories. This presents a significant indicator of the builder's legal performance. For context, the sole legal case involved a claim that Aakar Infrastructure violated the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 by failing to indicate its RERA registration and website in an advertisement. The response from the builder was that no willful violation of the Act had occurred. Ultimately, the verdict resulted in a penalty of Rs. 20,000 against Aakar Infrastructure.
Given the limited number of legal cases involving Aakar Infrastructure, potential buyers should proceed with caution. The sole case won by the builder indicates a possible pattern of overlooking regulatory mandates, which may affect future projects and customer interactions. Here are a few tips for those considering purchasing from Aakar Infrastructure:
In summary, while Aakar Infrastructure operates in a competitive real estate market, their legal history raises flags for cautious buyers. By implementing thorough research practices and staying informed of regulatory standards, potential homeowners can make educated decisions in their property investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Aakar Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two critical topics: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for misrepresentation.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, highlights the importance of adhering to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In one notable case, the appellant claimed that the builder had violated Section 11(2) of the RERA by failing to indicate the required registration and website information in an advertisement. This reflects a broader pattern of builders facing legal challenges due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards, particularly in their marketing materials.
The second theme, penalties for misrepresentation, overlaps with the first and demonstrates how builders may face legal repercussions for misleading potential buyers. The violation in the advertised material not only breaches the trust placed by buyers in the builder's representations but also underscores the legal obligations builders have to provide accurate information in their communications.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting what plaintiffs perceived as willful violations of regulatory requirements. Builders like Aakar Infrastructure faced scrutiny for actions that were deemed to mislead buyers or fail to comply with established regulations. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that one of the primary triggers for the builder’s litigation was the failure to meet regulatory standards, especially concerning transparency in advertising.
Examining the outcomes of the cases, it's evident that builders lost primarily due to their inability to defend their actions as compliant with the regulations. The common reasons for the losses include insufficient evidence to refute the claims of non-compliance and a lack of understanding of their obligations under the RERA. The penalties imposed, such as the Rs. 20,000 penalty in the cited case, serve as a warning to builders about the legal costs of non-compliance and misrepresentation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
160/2018 | Gujarat | The promoter-developer of the project 'Shalvik Ho… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Aakar Infrastructure | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1_uqAk4PunDn7FGTJORTr169qLsI7eWSF |