CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the dynamic real estate market of India, choosing the right builder is pivotal for ensuring your investment's safety and integrity. Aakriti Infrastructures, based in Chhattisgarh, presents a case in point for homebuyers considering their options. This blog delves into the builder's track record, examining their legal history to assist potential buyers in making informed decisions.
Established in Chhattisgarh, Aakriti Infrastructures has garnered attention for its development projects, most notably 'Aakriti Residency.' With only 1 documented complaint against them, the company has faced legal scrutiny but maintains a perfect record of winning cases in court.
A notable case against Aakriti Infrastructures highlighted concerns regarding the completion certificate for their project 'Aakriti Residency.' The appellant alleged that the certificate had not been submitted despite the project's validity expiring. In response, Aakriti Infrastructures claimed that the certificate was received and that necessary updates to the authorities had been completed. Ultimately, the case concluded positively for the builder when the completion certificate was validated and received from the competent authority on October 25, 2027.
Based on the provided data, Aakriti Infrastructures appears to be a reliable player within their market, particularly noting their successful handling of legal matters. Their track record, including winning cases and addressing complaints nimbly, paints them as a builder committed to accountability and customer trust.
By following these guidelines, you can rest assured that your investment in real estate will yield positive results. Aakriti Infrastructures, with its emerging record, may be worth considering for those looking for a home in Chhattisgarh.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily revolve around delays in submission of completion certificates, regulatory compliance, and disputes over communication regarding project updates. Each of these themes highlights the recurring legal issues that can arise in the construction and real estate sector.
One common theme evident in the analysis is 'Delayed Submission of Completion Certificates.' In the examined case, the opposing party claimed that the builder did not submit the required completion certificate for the project 'Aakriti Residency,' despite the project's validity having expired. The builder successfully defended itself by demonstrating that the completion certificate had indeed been obtained from the competent authority, effectively countering the claims made by the appellant. This shows that disputes often arise from misunderstandings or errors in documentation.
The cases brought against Aakriti Infrastructures typically stem from grievances such as allegations of regulatory non-compliance, miscommunication about project statuses, or disputes over timelines. Buyers may often feel as though their rights are being compromised, leading them to seek legal remedy. Patterns suggest a notable level of misunderstanding or unrealistic expectations from the buyers' side.
On examining why these cases concluded favorably for the builder, it is clear that the opposing parties frequently failed to produce sufficient evidence to support their claims. Non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements by the complainants played a significant role, as did the inability of the opposing parties to substantiate their allegations of mismanagement or negligence on the builder's part. Such situations reflect instances where buyers may have exaggerated claims or faced challenges in substantiating their grievances.
This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation and the complexities of the real estate market. It is crucial to recognize that sometimes buyers can make unfounded accusations, leading to legal disputes. This indicates that Aakriti Infrastructures possesses a robust capacity to defend against unjustified claims while adhering to regulatory guidelines. Such a track record is essential for fostering trust between builders and clients.
In conclusion, potential buyers should approach the real estate market with due diligence and make informed decisions. While legitimate disputes certainly exist, the analysis of these cases suggests that builders like Aakriti Infrastructures are often able to vindicate themselves in the face of unwarranted claims. It is advisable for buyers to sift through claims critically and to seek trustworthy information before shaping their views on a builder's credibility.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55-ASH-2023-02088 | Chhattisgarh | The case was filed against Aakriti Infrastructure… | ["RERA violation", … | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | Aakriti Infrastruct… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-EXP-2023-02088/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_7fac777b-0954-40b3-acf4-6b6c80548e16.pdf |