AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED logo

AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED

3.9/5 (40 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINU45201RJ2005PTC020854
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressMBS NAGAR,KOTA KOTA RJ 000000 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED is a builder primarily operating in Rajasthan with a reported total of 40 complaints against them, of which they have only won 2 cases and lost a substantial 38. This significant disparity raises a number of questions about their business practices and reliability as a builder.

Legal Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

Upon reviewing the 38 cases the builder lost, several common patterns emerge:
  1. Failure to Deliver Possession: Many complaints stem from the builder's inability to hand over possession of units, as claimed by complainants. Customers frequently reported that despite full payment, possession was either delayed indefinitely or not provided at all.
  2. Involvement in Legal Disputes without Representation: A consistent observation is that in some instances, the builder either failed to appear in court or did not defend their position adequately. This lack of legal engagement likely contributed to the unfavorable outcomes in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Orders Refund and Compensation Disputes Possession Delivery Issues Interest Calculation Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Aakriti Landcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, non-compliance with orders, refund and compensation disputes, possession delivery issues, and interest calculation disputes. The majority of the cases revolve around delayed possession claims, where buyers allege that the builder failed to deliver possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timeframe.

Common reasons for bringing these cases to court include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over interest calculations. A consistent pattern emerges from the summaries, which highlights the builder's recurring failure to meet project deadlines and fulfill their commitments to buyers. This has resulted in multiple claims for refunds and compensation, demonstrating a lack of trust in the builder's …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Legal Orders Disputes Over Project Execution and Timelines Regulatory Non-compliance Litigation Triggered by Penalties or Assessments

An analysis of the cases filed by AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder lost, reveals several insights regarding their litigation patterns and key issues faced in the court.

One prominent theme within the cases relates to 'Non-compliance with Legal Orders'. In the analyzed case, the builder evidently failed to comply with specific judicial directives, resulting in a dismissal of the appeal.

Another significant area of dispute was related to execution delays. While the builder may have contested delays attributed to external factors, the data suggests that the cases were often a reflection of broader issues with project timelines.

Additionally, there appears to be a pattern of regulatory non-compliance. Similar disputes may arise when builders do not adhere to municipal or other legal requirements, which can trigger litigation when claims for penalties or assessments are filed against them.

A common reason for AAKRITI LANDCON's litigation efforts …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Defect Removal Timeliness Disputes Arising from Buyer Claims Legal Compliance and Defense

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information.

The cases can be grouped around several common themes. A prevalent issue was the timeliness of defect removal. In one instance, the builder faced claims whereby it was alleged that defects were not rectified within the stipulated time frame. Although there were minimal responses from the respondents in these cases, the core concern tends to revolve around the expectations of buyers regarding timely maintenance and corrective action.

AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED often brought these disputes to the court to contest unfounded claims or to clarify obligations regarding defect rectification. The builder’s litigation appears driven by the need to defend its practices against buyer accusations that could stem from misunderstandings or differing expectations about the contractual obligations surrounding defect handling.

One common reason for the builder's successes in these legally …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Project Incompletion Non-Compliance with Registration Regulations

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily revolve around issues of delayed possession and compliance with project registration requirements. The recurring themes identified include 'Delayed Possession Claims,' where buyers sought the timely handover of their properties, and 'Project Incompletion,' a crucial factor in each case where the builder's defense was grounded in the ongoing status of the projects at the time of filing. Additionally, 'Non-Compliance with Registration Regulations' surfaced as a vital issue, indicating many complaints arose from misunderstandings regarding project statuses.

The main reasons these cases made it to court often revolved around claims related to penalties for project delays or disagreements over the handover of units. Buyers, feeling aggrieved, brought these complaints to seek resolution and redressal. Patterns have emerged suggesting that many of these complaints stem from a buyer's …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from AAKRITI LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.