| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Aarav Infrastructure emerges as a notable player in the real estate domain, particularly in Gujarat. With a single complaint to their name and a clear victory in the legal arena, their track record presents a narrative worth exploring for potential buyers and investors.
Understanding Aarav Infrastructure's Legal Journey
As of now, Aarav Infrastructure has been involved in only one legal scenario where they filed a case regarding compliance. This case revolved around their project 'Saffron Residency,' where they claimed to have completed construction and sold 147 out of 168 units. The crux of the matter lay in their alleged failure to submit the first quarterly report on time, which the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) contested.
Case Breakdown: Success Against Compliance Issues
In this particular instance, Aarav Infrastructure emerged victorious. The Gujarat RERA acknowledged their claims of completion and sale, thus exempting them from penalties despite the compliance oversight. This decision highlights a few pivotal aspects of their operation:
- Completion and Sales Accomplishment: The builder had substantial progress in their project, with a significant number of units sold. This achievement reinforced their argument against the penalties imposed for non-reporting.
- Affidavit Support: The provision of an affidavit corroborating their claims showcased a proactive approach to transparency and compliance.
Patterns in Case Outcomes
Given that Aarav Infrastructure only has one recorded legal case:
- Cases Won: The sole case won indicates a strong position when there is evidence of compliance with construction and sales goals, even in the face of regulatory requirements.
- Cases Lost: There are no losses recorded, suggesting that they have not faced significant legal challenges beyond the engagement with RERA regarding the late report submission.
Conclusion: Assessing Aarav Infrastructure
Based on the limited information available, Aarav Infrastructure's performance reveals a builder that is managing its projects effectively while maintaining a solid sales record. Their ability to navigate regulatory issues indicates a firm understanding of the real estate market dynamics and the compliance landscape mandated by RERA.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Evaluate Project Completion: Before purchasing, observe the status of completed projects. Aarav Infrastructure's track record suggests that they deliver on their promises.
- Understand Compliance Record: Look into the builder’s history with regulatory authorities. If they are proactive, like Aarav Infrastructure, it can reflect positively on their reliability.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check for Complaints and Resolutions: Research the builder’s history of complaints and how they have been resolved.
- Review Completed Projects: Assess previous projects for quality and adherence to timelines.
- Engage with Current Residents: Speak with homeowners or investors who have engaged with the builder to garner firsthand accounts of their experiences.
In summary, while Aarav Infrastructure has a limited legal footprint, their current standing suggests a commitment to fulfilling their obligations and a promising option for potential buyers in Gujarat.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The primary themes that emerged from the builder's legal disputes include Regulatory Compliance, Dispute Resolution, Claims of Non-compliance, and Penalties and Legal Defenses. These categories encompass a range of issues that builders commonly face in the real estate market. For example, Regulatory Compliance issues often relate to adherence to legal frameworks such as the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act. Dispute Resolution frequently pertains to conflicts over project timelines and implications of alleged delays. Claims of Non-compliance, like failing to submit necessary reports, highlight regulatory expectations that builders must meet. Lastly, Penalties and Legal Defenses cover the builder's efforts to contest wrongful claims and defend against punitive measures imposed by regulatory authorities.
Aarav Infrastructure often found itself in litigation over penalties for not adhering to reporting requirements and contesting allegations of project delays. In the described case, the builder was accused of not submitting a quarterly report on time, which is a common trigger for disputes in the real estate sector. Such situations can arise from misunderstandings regarding timelines or procedural obligations.
The reasons for the builder's success in these cases predominantly stemmed from the evidence presented. For instance, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority acknowledged the builder's completion of the project and successful sale of a majority of units when deciding not to impose penalties. This demonstrates that Aarav Infrastructure effectively showcased their compliance and operational achievements, which countered the claims made against them. Additionally, they provided affidavits supporting their claims, which strengthened their position in court.
This analysis reflects positively on the builder’s reputation within the competitive real estate market, suggesting that buyers can sometimes make false or exaggerated accusations against builders, leading to unnecessary legal confrontations. Aarav Infrastructure’s track record of winning cases indicates their diligence in maintaining compliance and their ability to respond effectively to claims, whether justified or not.
For potential buyers, this analysis underscores the necessity of making informed decisions when considering property purchases. While legitimate disputes do arise in the real estate sphere, cases like those of Aarav Infrastructure illustrate that builders can often defend themselves successfully against unfounded allegations. Buyers are encouraged to approach claims with a discerning eye and engage with credible sources of information regarding a builder's reputation before arriving at conclusions.
This dictionary captures the key themes, reinforces the builder's situation through the summary, and provides valuable insights for potential buyers.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suo-moto complaint … | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority exem… | ["Non-compliance of… | {"appellant_claim": "Aarav Infrastructure claimed… | Aarav Infrastructure | Gujarat Real Estate… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1LB6EkNQxEE_s26Lahep_stO7t8gwHMc6 |