Analysis of the cases filed against Aarohi Builders and Land Developers, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into common themes, each highlighting significant areas of contention in the builder's operations.

The first theme, Delayed Possession Claims, encompasses a significant number of cases where buyers or lessees claimed that the builder failed to deliver properties within the stipulated timelines. These cases often revolved around the financial and emotional distress caused to purchasers who counted on timely possession of their homes.

The Non-compliance with Municipal Orders theme highlights instances where the builder allegedly breached regulatory requirements imposed by local authorities. This could pertain to anything from failure to obtain necessary permits to non-compliance with zoning regulations, leading to legal consequences.

Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification represent another recurring theme. In these cases, parties often disputed the builder's classification or conversion of land, which could involve allegations of misuse of agricultural land for commercial purposes or other similar grievances.

Lastly, Penalties for Project Delays serves as a theme where the builder faced legal challenges due to delays attributed to their actions. This could include cases where the builder was held accountable for failing to meet project deadlines, resulting in financial penalties or other legal ramifications.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the majority of cases seem to stem from the builder's failure to adhere to established timelines, regulations, or classifications. Buyers and regulators alike expressed concerns through the legal system, indicating a lack of trust in the builder's ability to fulfill commitments without breaches.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to defend their actions, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and failure to follow interim directions from authorities. In some instances, misunderstandings of land or project classification rules also led to legal defeats, highlighting the need for diligence in these areas.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to carefully consider these legal disputes when evaluating Aarohi Builders and Land Developers. It suggests a systemic issue with the builder's operations that could impact future projects, raising concerns about reliability and accountability in fulfilling contracts and complying with laws.