CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realm of real estate, the reputation of a builder can significantly impact the decision-making process for potential buyers. Aasara Construction Private Limited, based in Madhya Pradesh, is one such builder that has garnered attention due to its legal encounters. With a tally of one complaint filed against it and a zero-case-win record, it's essential to delve deeper into the circumstances surrounding its legal history and what this means for prospective customers.
Aasara Construction Private Limited operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh and has faced one formal complaint concerning its services. Analyzing the legal battles faced by this builder will enable buyers to make informed decisions.
The builder has been involved in one notable legal case:
Aasara Construction Private Limited has faced one loss in court. The common factor observed in this case is the issue of possession delays. Potential buyers should be cautious of potential delays in project delivery, as this could lead to disputes similar to the one faced by the builder in the past.
While there are no cases won by Aasara Construction, it's important to note that the singular case presented indicates a defensive strategy where the builder contested payment claims rather than fully addressing project delivery timelines.
The legal history of Aasara Construction Private Limited paints a cautious picture for potential buyers. The single complaint against the builder, resulting in a loss, suggests potential shortcomings in meeting contractual obligations, particularly in terms of timely possession.
Tips for Potential Buyers:In conclusion, while Aasara Construction has demonstrated the ability to navigate the legal landscape, potential buyers should proceed with caution and armed with the right knowledge to safeguard their investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Aasara Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around three topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over payment and consideration, and compensation for mental distress.
The cases often involve claims from buyers that the builder failed to deliver possession of their plots within the agreed-upon timeframe. This is a recurring theme in real estate disputes, where buyers expect timely possession of their properties. In the case summarized, the applicant sought interest at a rate of 36% per annum due to the delay, indicating a significant level of dissatisfaction with the builder's performance.
Another common theme is disputes over the payment and consideration. Buyers and builders often find themselves at odds over whether full payment has been made for services rendered or properties delivered. In the case above, the builder claimed that the applicant had not paid the consideration amount in full, which is a typical defense in real estate transactions. This highlights the importance of clear payment terms and thorough documentation in property deals.
The verdicts also frequently mention compensation for mental distress, which suggests that buyers are not just concerned with financial losses but also emotional strain caused by delays and disputes. Courts are increasingly recognizing mental distress as a valid reason for compensation in contract disputes, especially in significant purchases like real estate.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against Aasara Construction seem to stem from a combination of these factors. Buyers are particularly triggered to take legal action when they experience delays in possession, perceive a lack of transparency in payment requirements, or feel that their emotional distress has not been acknowledged.
The builder's losses in these cases appear to primarily stem from a failure to fulfill their contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely possession and clear communication of payment requirements. While the specific reasons for the losses are not detailed in the summaries, it is evident that Aasara Construction has faced challenges in meeting buyer expectations, which has resulted in legal consequences.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 - CHASH ,-48-0407 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Non-possession of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Jaiprakash Gaur | Aasara Construction… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/174573338352.pdf |