| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. One such builder, AASHRAY DEVELOPERS, has recently come under scrutiny due to its legal challenges. This blog post delves into their performance, legal disputes, and offers insights for potential buyers.
Company Overview
Name: AASHRAY DEVELOPERS
States with Projects: Maharashtra
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
Legal Case Details
AASHRAY DEVELOPERS has faced one legal complaint which resulted in a loss for the builder. The details of the case are as follows:
- Summary of Cases:
- Appellant Claim: The appellant (complainant) argued that AASHRAY DEVELOPERS did not consider the true facts of the matter and failed to obtain their consent before making alterations to project plans.
- Respondent Claim: The builder contended that they had not received the correct payment from the appellant.
- Final Verdict: The appeal was partially allowed, meaning the previous order against the builder was set aside, but the complaint was remanded back to the authority for fresh consideration.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Cases Lost
AASHRAY DEVELOPERS has lost all cases against them. The primary factors highlighted in the cases involve:
- Decision-making Issues: The builder has faced criticism for potentially unilaterally altering project details, which can lead to customer dissatisfaction and trust issues.
- Financial Disputes: The issue of payment discrepancies suggests negligence or miscommunication regarding financial transactions.
Cases Won
Despite having only one legal complaint, that case did not end in a complete win for the builder. However, it is noted that the appeal process allowed for future consideration by the authority, indicating that while AASHRAY DEVELOPERS did not receive a ruling in their favor, the case is still open for a more thorough evaluation.
Conclusion
Based on the provided information, AASHRAY DEVELOPERS has faced significant legal challenges, which raises questions for potential buyers. With a single complaint resulting in a lost case, it may reflect on the builder's operational practices and their approach to customer relations.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Due Diligence: Before purchasing, research the builder's past performance, reviews, and any ongoing legal matters.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights as a buyer in real estate transactions, particularly regarding changes to property plans.
- Seek Transparency: Ask for open discussions regarding payment processes to avoid discrepancies in future.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reputation: Look for reviews and customer feedback across multiple platforms.
- Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit other projects completed by the builder to assess quality and attention to detail.
- Legal Record: Investigate the builder's history, including any legal claims or disputes, to gauge reliability.
In conclusion, while AASHRAY DEVELOPERS may offer opportunities, prospective buyers must proceed with caution and thorough diligence.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against AASHRAY DEVELOPERS, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: Disputes over Project Changes and Consent and Claims of Incorrect Payment Amounts.
In the first type of dispute, exemplified by the appeal that was partly allowed, the appellant claimed that the Authority made changes to the plans without their consent. This highlights a common theme in real estate litigation where builders and homeowners/appellants often contest decisions made by authorities, particularly when those decisions involve alterations to original plans or agreements. Such cases usually revolve around the builder’s obligation to obtain requisite approvals and consents, and the authority's responsibility to ensure that all changes comply with regulatory frameworks.
The second theme pertains to financial discrepancies, with the builder claiming that they had not received the correct amount paid by the appellant. This indicates another frequent trigger for litigation in real estate, which is the accusation of incorrect payments or financial mishandling. It reflects the ongoing challenge in the sector to ensure transparency and accurate accounting in transactions between builders and their clients.
A pattern emerges from these summaries suggesting that one of the primary reasons individuals bring cases against AASHRAY DEVELOPERS involves issues of compliance—either with regulatory requirements in making project changes or with financial obligations in transactions. The builder’s losses in these cases point to recurring issues such as insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to obtain necessary consents, and possibly mismanagement of financial records.
Overall, these cases underline the importance for prospective buyers to conduct thorough due diligence when engaging with builders. Investigating a builder's legal history and reviewing project plans and financial arrangements carefully are crucial steps to take before committing to a property. Buyers should be vigilant for signs of ongoing litigation, particularly cases involving project delays or financial disputes, as these may indicate broader operational issues.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000010705 | Maharashtra | The appellant challenged the order of the Authori… | ["Real Estate", "RE… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Suresh Rathod | Aashray Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1JewGZ854sHxvNevhSWLMv-Zs-eLTeCcG |