CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When choosing a builder for your home, it is essential to consider their reputation and past legal issues. AASTHA PROPERTIES, operating in Karnataka, has had limited but noteworthy legal encounters. In this blog post, we will investigate the legal background of AASTHA PROPERTIES, analyze their complaints, and provide insights for potential buyers.
AASTHA PROPERTIES has one recorded complaint against them. This single case resulted in a loss for the builder, indicating that there may be underlying issues concerning their business practices, particularly regarding financial transactions in real estate.
In the court case filed against AASTHA PROPERTIES, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to refund an advance payment of Rs. 3,75,000/- and did not provide necessary documents for purchasing a flat. The builder's defense was that they had provided the required documentation but that the appellant had not completed the payment of the remaining amount.
The final verdict favored the appellant, with the court ordering AASTHA PROPERTIES to refund the full amount along with an interest rate of 10.25% per annum until the amount was paid. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to contractual obligations and providing transparent documentation during real estate transactions.
Based on the data, AASTHA PROPERTIES has a relatively high-risk profile, given the single complaint resulting in a loss for the builder. The inability to win any cases further deteriorates their reputation.
In conclusion, while AASTHA PROPERTIES operates in Karnataka and may seem appealing at first glance, the existing legal issues suggest a need for scrutiny by prospective buyers. Always prioritize due diligence to secure your investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against AASTHA PROPERTIES, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Advance Payment Disputes and Document Provision Controversies.
In the case of Advance Payment Disputes, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to return an advance payment of Rs. 3,75,000/- after not providing the necessary documents for the purchase of a flat. This indicates a troubling trend where buyers may be left waiting for refunds on payments they made in good faith, only to find themselves in legal battles to recover their money.
The Document Provision Controversies highlight the importance of transparency and adequate documentation in real estate transactions. In this case, the builder contended that they had supplied the required documents, while the appellant disagreed. This raises questions about the builder's compliance with legal standards for document provision and whether they adequately fulfill their obligations to customers.
A common trigger for litigation in these cases appears to be the builder's failure to meet contractual obligations—particularly concerning payments and documentation. Buyers often find themselves contesting what they perceive as unfair practices or negligence on the part of the builder.
The builder's losses in these cases likely stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims. For instance, if the builder did indeed provide necessary documents, they may have failed to prove this adequately in court. Moreover, non-compliance with regulatory requirements regarding advance payments and document provision may have undermined their defense.
Overall, these cases shine a spotlight on the challenges faced by buyers in the real estate market. Buyers should be vigilant and ensure that builders adhere to agreed-upon terms, maintain transparency, and fulfill their obligations. It is also crucial for buyers to keep thorough records and seek legal advice if they experience issues with builders.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!