CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a property investment, the reputation and reliability of a builder play a crucial role in ensuring a smooth purchasing experience. Today, we delve into A.B. Apartments Private Limited, a builder with a presence in Punjab and a track record worth examining.
A.B. Apartments Private Limited has faced a total of one complaint, resulting in one loss in a legal case. This record raises concerns regarding the builder's commitment to fulfilling customer obligations, particularly in matters related to timely possession and refunds. Below, we explore the details of the legal issues encountered and conclude with prudent tips for potential homebuyers.
In the singular legal case against A.B. Apartments Private Limited:
This outcome indicates a significant failure on the part of A.B. Apartments to meet contractual obligations, resulting in financial repercussions and legal penalties.
Although the builder has only one case documented:
Based on the provided information, A.B. Apartments Private Limited has demonstrated a concerning approach to customer satisfaction and legal compliance. With one complaint leading to a ruling against the builder, potential buyers should approach with caution.
In conclusion, while A.B. Apartments Private Limited operates in Punjab, their singular legal case outcome prompts caution. Prospective buyers should exercise due diligence and consider the potential risks associated with their investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.B. Apartments Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Refund and Compensation Disputes.
The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to deliver possession of properties on time, which led to claims from the complainants seeking refunds and compensation for the delays. For instance, in one significant case, the complainant asserted that the builder had failed to provide a proper refund and compensation despite the delay in delivery, while the builder contended that the complainant had not come forward to execute the sale deed. The adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the builder to refund Rs. 29,33,900 along with interest and compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 for mental agony and litigation expenses.
A common trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder's inability to meet project timelines, which invariably led to disputes over adequate refunds and compensation. Complainants often contested the builder's position by arguing that the delays were not attributable to them, rather to the builder's own operational inefficiencies. The builder, on the other hand, frequently sought to deflect responsibility by claiming that buyers failed to finalize agreements or execute necessary documents.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely delivery or valid reasons for delays was a recurring issue. Moreover, the builder's failure to comply with regulatory requirements regarding timely possession and refunds likely played a significant role in the legal outcomes. Misunderstandings about their obligations in terms of providing compensation for delays also hindered their defense.
In conclusion, the analysis highlights the importance for builders to adhere to timelines, fulfill their obligations, and maintain transparent communication with buyers. It also serves as a reminder to buyers to be vigilant and informed about their rights, ensuring they can take appropriate action if necessary.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADC1653/2020 | Punjab | The complainant, Parul Batra, filed a complaint a… | ["Refund", "Compens… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Parul Batra | A.B. Apartments Pri… | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2021\/20210701OJbyAO4787e771-cd05-4b4c-80d5-0c95bb0adce3.pdf |