CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, homebuyers continually seek builders they can trust to deliver on their promises. Today, we focus our attention on AB Apartments Private Limited, located in Punjab. Despite its offerings, potential clients need to be well-informed about the builder's track record, particularly regarding legal disputes.
AB Apartments Private Limited has faced a total of three complaints resulting in the loss of all three cases. This rate of legal challenges raises concerns about the builder's reliability and accountability in handling project deliveries and customer relations.
Interestingly, the cases identified as won by the builder were all dismissed either due to withdrawals by complainants or stipulated conditions favoring the plaintiffs, while also indicating that they did not contribute to the builder's reputation positively. For instance:
Given the provided data, AB Apartments Private Limited presents a concerning picture for potential buyers. The 100% loss rate in legal disputes illustrates significant challenges related to customer service and satisfaction. The forced payment of interest due to delivery delays further solidifies doubts about the builder’s operational efficiency.
AB Apartments Private Limited's current standing reveals several red flags that potential homebuyers should carefully consider. By approaching the home buying process with diligence and caution, buyers can protect themselves from the pitfalls associated with unreliable builders. Armed with knowledge and thorough research, buyers can make more informed decisions, ensuring that their investments yield the desired outcomes.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against AB Apartments Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the plaintiffs. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with multiple complainants alleging that they had not received possession of their plots despite having made payments.
The builder's defense often centered around payment disputes, claiming that the complainants had failed to make payments in accordance with the agreed-upon schedule. However, the verdicts consistently favored the complainants, indicating that the builder's reasoning did not meet the required legal standards. The decision-making process highlighted a pattern where the builder was held accountable for delays attributed to their operational inefficiencies rather than non-payments from buyers.
A critical point of contention was the interest on delay, which the builder was ordered to pay in several cases. The ruling mandated interest at the rate of 9.30% per annum from the specified date until the offer of possession was made, reinforcing the commitment to compensating buyers for prolonged wait periods.
The common triggers for the builder's litigation primarily revolved around the failure to deliver possession on time, which directly led to payment disputes. The builder's inability to provide valid reasons for the delays, coupled with insufficient evidence to support their claims, resulted in legal losses.
The verdicts also highlighted a concerning trend where buyers felt compelled to take legal action to obtain their rightful property and interest compensation, which raises questions about the builder's operational integrity and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!