CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive market of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for ensuring a satisfactory property investment. A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction, operating predominantly in Madhya Pradesh, has entered the spotlight due to a notable legal case and its limited track record. In this blog post, we will discuss the builder's legal history, analyze the patterns in their cases, and provide valuable tips for potential buyers.
The records indicate that A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction has faced a total of 1 complaint, with a troubling outcome. They lost the only legal case that was filed against them, which raises concerns for potential buyers.
The sole case involved the following:
Given that the builder has lost the only case filed against them, we can identify certain patterns that could be alarming for potential buyers:
It is essential to note that A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction has not won any cases; thus, no discernible patterns can be identified in terms of successes in disputes. This lack of favorable outcomes signals a troubling trend and raises questions about the builder's reliability and capability to manage projects competently.
Based on the information provided, A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction seems to have a challenging standing in the real estate market, predominantly marked by their single loss in a legal dispute. Potential buyers should exercise caution and thoroughly evaluate their decision before entering any agreement with this builder.
In closing, while A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction has made an effort in the construction domain, their current standing raises red flags for prospective buyers. Assessing all factors thoroughly before making a purchase decision will ensure a more secure investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.B. Aradhya Bhumika Builder & Construction, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The primary type of cases were centered around Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers expressed dissatisfaction after paying substantial amounts for properties that were not delivered on time. In one notable case, the applicant paid Rs. 32,67,980, yet the builder failed to provide possession as scheduled.
A common thread among these cases was the builder's Failure to Provide Explanation for Delays. In the absence of valid reasons for the postponements, the adjudicating officer tended to side with the applicants, emphasizing the importance of transparency in real estate transactions. This highlights a pattern where buyers were not only concerned about timely delivery but also sought accountability and clear communication from the builder.
The verdicts consistently mandated Compensation for Mental Distress and Physical Pain alongside financial reimbursements. This demonstrates a recognition by the legal authorities that delays in home deliveries can lead to significant emotional and psychological ramifications for buyers, moving beyond mere financial losses.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, primarily insufficient evidence to justify the delays and a lack of compliance with the promised timelines. The failure to address buyer concerns openly and adequately resulted in legal consequences, indicating a fundamental breakdown in communication and trust between the builder and its clients.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for builders to prioritize timely possession, maintain transparency, and adhere to their commitments. Buyers should take note of these patterns when evaluating builders, ensuring they consider historical performance and legal disputes before making significant financial investments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-87|-49-0694 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant paid Rs. 32,67,980 to the non-appli… | ["Non-payment of po… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant paid Rs. 32,67… | Shri Surendra Dwive… | A.B. Aradhya Bhumik… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/480122822518.pdf |