CIN | U45206KA2008PTC045703 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Sy. No. 216, situated in S. Medahalli Village Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk , Anekal, Karnataka, India - 562125 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the real estate landscape of Karnataka, ABAN Developers Private Limited has garnered attention, but not necessarily for the right reasons. With a mixed track record in legal complaints, potential buyers might find themselves questioning the reliability of this builder. In this post, we will delve into the complaints filed against ABAN Developers, analyze the outcomes, and offer insights for potential homebuyers.
ABAN Developers has faced two legal complaints, both of which resulted in unfavorable outcomes for the builder. The issues cited in these cases mainly revolved around delays in the possession of apartments and claims of unfair terms in the agreement to sell.
Both cases presented against ABAN Developers involved similar claims from the complainants: the demand for compensation due to delays in receiving possession of the purchased apartments, coupled with allegations of unfair terms within the sale agreements. The builder's defense relied on the assertion that the agreements were made prior to the enactment of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and that their project was not registered with RERA.
Despite these defenses, the adjudicating officer ruled against ABAN Developers in both instances, directing them to compensate the complainants with interest at a rate of 9% per annum from the time of payment until either the handing over of possession or the cancellation of the agreement. This pattern highlights a clear concern regarding the builder's adherence to contractual obligations and overall project timelines.
The common thread in the cases lost by ABAN Developers points to:
Interestingly, ABAN Developers has not won any cases, which skews their legal standing predominantly towards the negative. This lack of victories suggests a pattern where the builder may lack adequate defenses or fails to substantiate claims against complaints regarding project management and contractual obligations.
In summary, ABAN Developers Private Limited has an alarming record that potential buyers should consider carefully. With two lost cases and no victories, this builder represents a risk in terms of adhering to commitments, particularly regarding timely possession and fair contractual dealings. This track record raises concerns about their reliability and professionalism in the competitive real estate market.
If you are considering purchasing property from ABAN Developers or any builder, keep in mind the following tips:
By taking precautions and conducting thorough research, you can mitigate risks and make a more informed decision when selecting a builder in your quest for a new home.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against ABAN DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the homeowners. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Unfair Terms in Agreement to Sell, and RERA Compliance Disputes.
The cases often revolved around the claimants seeking compensation for significant delays in the possession of their apartments. This indicates a pattern where the builder was unable to meet the promised timelines, leading to dissatisfaction among its clients. The claimants also frequently pointed out unfair terms in the agreements to sell, suggesting that the contracts may have been weighted heavily in favor of the builder, causing financial and emotional distress for the buyers.
A crucial factor in these cases was the builder's defense based on the RERA Act. The builder consistently claimed that the agreements were entered into prior to the implementation of the RERA Act and that the projects were not registered with RERA. However, this defense did not stand, as the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the claimants, indicating a failure on the builder's part to comply with regulatory requirements.
The common triggers for litigation in these cases were the delays in possession and the perceived unfairness in the sale agreements. People brought cases to court primarily to seek justice for the prolonged waiting periods and financial losses incurred due to these delays. The builder's inability to address these grievances effectively led to legal actions.
The builder lost these cases predominantly due to its inability to fulfill contractual obligations regarding timely possession. The ruling highlighted a non-compliance issue with the RERA Act, which raises concerns about the builder's adherence to laws governing real estate transactions. Overall, these cases shine a spotlight on the importance of transparency and accountability in real estate dealings, serving as a cautionary tale for potential buyers.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!