ABHIMANYU BUILDCON

Understanding Abhimanyu Buildcon: A Case Study on Builder Performance

In the competitive world of real estate, builders often face scrutiny concerning their project delivery and legal compliance. Today, we take a closer look at Abhimanyu Buildcon, a builder primarily active in Rajasthan, to assess their performance through the lens of complaints and legal cases.

Overview of Abhimanyu Buildcon

Abhimanyu Buildcon has a relatively clean legal slate, with only one recorded complaint. Remarkably, they have successfully resolved this matter in their favor, indicating a potentially effective approach to addressing customer concerns and legal challenges.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

Out of the solitary complaint, Abhimanyu Buildcon faced a legal challenge for not seeking an extension for the validity of project registration. According to the appellant claims, the builder neglected to file for an extension before the project expiration date of December 31, 2018. However, the builder countered with proof of a completion certificate issued as of January 30, 2019, along with a payment receipt for an extension of validity dated August 26, 2021.

In this particular case, the authority conditionally discharged the notice after evaluating the provided documentation. This outcome illustrates a common pattern where disputes often arise from miscommunications or oversights regarding timelines and necessary documentation. Abhimanyu Buildcon's provision of relevant certificates and receipts showcases the importance of maintaining clear records and timely communications with regulatory authorities.

Cases Won

Abhimanyu Buildcon's record shows that they have not lost any additional cases beyond the single instance detailed above. This denotes a significant achievement—indicating that the builder has effectively navigated any challenges they faced. The fact that they have won their case demonstrates their capability to provide proof and document their compliance with regulatory requirements.

Patterns and Common Factors

• Common Factors in Lost Cases: A clear trend in the case lost by Abhimanyu Buildcon centers around compliance with regulatory timelines and documentation. Failure to seek timely extensions when required can lead to disputes and complaints.
• Common Factors in Won Cases: On the flip side, the builder has shown an adeptness at gathering and presenting documentation when required. Their ability to provide timely certificates and payment receipts was instrumental in the favorable resolution of their complaint.

Conclusion

Based on the current data, Abhimanyu Buildcon presents as a reliable builder in Rajasthan, with a single complaint and a 100% success rate in legal resolutions. Potential buyers may find confidence in their ability to handle compliance issues effectively.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Verify Documentation: Always request to see completion certificates and any relevant extensions prior to purchasing. Being knowledgeable about the builder's documentation practices may save you from future disputes.
• Research the Builder's Background: Understand the builder's history, reputation, and project delivery timelines.
• Seek Reviews: Look for customer testimonials or reviews to gauge other buyers' experiences with Abhimanyu Buildcon.

General Tips for Selecting Builders

1. Check Legal Compliance: Ensure the builder has a good standing with local authorities and no pending legal complaints.
2. Visit Previous Projects: If possible, tour completed projects to get firsthand experience of the builder’s craftsmanship and attention to detail.
3. Understand the Contract: Before signing any agreement, comprehensively understand the terms and conditions, including timelines, payment schedules, and warranties.

In conclusion, while Abhimanyu Buildcon has shown promise with minimal complaints and successful legal outcomes, potential buyers should remain vigilant when selecting any builder. Doing thorough research and addressing documentation is key to ensuring a smooth purchasing experience.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Abhimanyu Buildcon, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around themes of Regulatory Compliance, Project Registration Disputes, and Claims of Delayed Project Completion. Each theme encapsulates common scenarios that often lead to legal confrontations in the rapidly evolving real estate sector.

1. Regulatory Compliance: This theme includes challenges regarding the adherence to project registration regulations and timelines. In this context, the authority claimed that the promoter did not seek an extension for the validity of the project registration despite the registration period elapsing on 31.12.2018. Such cases often arise when regulatory bodies seek to enforce compliance and penalize non-conforming practices.
2. Project Registration Disputes: Central to some of the cases is the argument concerning the registration validity of the projects. In this case, the builder successfully demonstrated the submission of a completion certificate and a payment receipt for extension, showcasing compliance with the rules.
3. Claims of Delayed Project Completion: Disputes around project completion timelines frequently lead to legal actions. Claims may emerge from buyers believing that the timelines were not met. However, the evidence presented by the builder indicated adherence to necessary formalities, hence the favorable verdict.

The reasons for these cases being brought forth by opposing parties often stemmed from contesting penalties, claims of project delays, or potential misunderstandings related to land classifications or regulations. This reveals a pattern where buyers and regulatory bodies may act on perceived infractions that sometimes lack substantial ground.

The common reasons the builder, Abhimanyu Buildcon, won these cases included the inability of the opposing parties to present sufficient evidence or comply with regulatory requirements. In this particular case, the builder was able to provide a completion certificate and a payment receipt for extension, ultimately leading to a discharge of notice against them. This success indicates the builder's competence in following through with legal obligations and documenting progress effectively.

This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation as well as the broader dynamics of the real estate market. It demonstrates that while legitimate disputes do exist, there are instances where buyers make false or exaggerated claims against builders, resulting in drawn-out legal skirmishes. Abhimanyu Buildcon's strong track record in defending itself against such claims enhances its credibility in the eyes of current and potential customers.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach claims carefully and consider the context and reliability of information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. While the real estate market has its share of disputes, the overarching analysis indicates that builders like Abhimanyu Buildcon can often successfully defend themselves against unjust accusations. Making informed decisions is critical in navigating these complexities and ensuring a positive experience in property transactions.