CIN | U70109HR2020PTC090928 |
---|---|
Year Established | 12-Nov-20 |
Address | 12A Floor, Tower 2 M3M International Financial Center, Sector-66 Gurugram Gurgaon HR 122002 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited has made its mark primarily in Haryana's real estate market. However, like many builders, it is not without its legal challenges. In this blog post, we will explore the complaints filed against the builder, analyze the outcomes of the legal cases, and provide insightful recommendations for potential buyers.
Adhikaansh Realtors has a total of 4 complaints filed against it, out of which they won 3 cases and lost 1. This balance indicates a generally positive outcome for the builder, though the losses present an opportunity for scrutiny.
In contrast to the losses, the builder successfully settled one case through an amicable agreement, indicating the ability to resolve issues without court intervention. This resolution reflects positively on the builder's willingness to negotiate and find common ground with complainants.
Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited operates in a competitive market with a record that includes both victories and defeats in legal cases. For prospective buyers, understanding the builder's legal history is crucial. Here are some tips for those considering a purchase:
In summary, while Adhikaansh Realtors has faced its share of legal troubles, its proactive measures and case outcomes offer a mixed but largely positive perspective for potential buyers considering investment in their projects.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, disputes over land conversion or classification, project delay penalties, and regulatory non-compliance.
Many of the cases involve delayed possession claims, where buyers contested the builder's inability to deliver units on time. Common reasons for these delays included mismanagement, insufficient resources, and a failure to anticipate complexities in the construction process. Buyers in these cases often sought compensation for the prolonged duration in which they were unable to occupy their properties.
Disputes over land conversion or classification also emerged as a significant theme. Here, the builder faced challenges due to disagreements over the zoning or classification of the land on which the projects were developed. Parties other than the builder might have argued that the builder did not adhere to the proper land use designations, which led to legal actions.
Project delay penalties were another recurring issue, with cases often revolving around the financial penalties imposed on the builder for failing to complete projects within stipulated timelines. The builder may have disputed these penalties by arguing that the delays were caused by unforeseen circumstances or other parties involved in the project.
Finally, regulatory non-compliance stood out as a key reason for the builder's losses in these cases. The settlements might have indicated that the builder failed to comply with municipal orders or other regulatory requirements, leading to legal consequences.
The common triggers for the builder's litigation include failing to meet project timelines, not adhering to land use classifications, and facing penalties that they sought to contest. The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and a lack of adherence to interim directions provided by courts or regulatory bodies.
Overall, this analysis highlights the importance for prospective buyers to thoroughly investigate a builder's reputation, track record, and regulatory compliance before making any investment decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR/385/2023 | Haryana | Dhurv Sharma vs Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limit… | ["Real Estate Dispu… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r… | Dhurv Sharma | Adhikaansh Realtors… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTUwNzgz |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases generally fell into two primary themes: Cancellation of Units Due to Non-Payment and Settlement of Payment Disputes.
The reasons for these disputes primarily revolved around payment compliance, where buyers either did not understand the payment conditions or were unable to meet them. The cases also reflect a broader tendency for buyers to contest decisions made by builders, especially regarding cancellations, leading to unnecessary legal complications.
Common factors contributing to the builder's successful defense included evidential support regarding the buyers’ non-compliance with payment terms, clear communication of policies, and fulfilling contractual obligations. The builder showcased a strong adherence to regulatory requirements, effectively countering claims rooted in misunderstandings or exaggerations by the opposing parties.
This analysis provides insight into the builder's reputation within the broader real estate market. It highlights that while there can be legitimate grievances, buyers sometimes make unfounded accusations. Despite the legal challenges, Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited demonstrates a robust capability to defend against such claims, affirming its position as a builder committed to fair practice and compliance.
To potential buyers, it is imperative to approach real estate transactions with careful consideration. The analysis of these legal cases bolsters the notion that while disputes can arise, established builders like Adhikaansh Realtors Private Limited can successfully vindicate themselves against unwarranted claims. Seeking reliable information and understanding contractual terms is crucial to making informed decisions in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR/2497/2022 | Haryana | Anita Verma and Balraj filed a complaint against … | ["Real Estate Dispu… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed an am… | Balraj | Adhikaansh Realtors… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTU5Njc1 |
7490 of 2022 | Haryana | Complainant's unit was cancelled by respondent du… | ["Non-payment of ou… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed that res… | Dilip Kumar | Adhikaansh Realtors… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTY2MDYx |