CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Adish Buildcare Private Limited operates in Chhattisgarh, yet their reputation has come under scrutiny following numerous legal complaints. With 9 cases filed against them and a disheartening record of having lost all cases, potential buyers need to approach with caution.
In the context of legal issues, it is crucial to delve into the details of the 9 cases that have been filed against Adish Buildcare Private Limited. Each case predominantly revolves around similar grievances that seem to paint a troubling picture of the builder’s business practices.
The cases lost by Adish Buildcare primarily highlight the following recurring themes:
Interestingly, while Adish Buildcare has lost all of its cases, the nature of the orders from the authorities indicates that, in each case, there was a directive for the builder to return payments with interest. This reflects:
Adish Buildcare Private Limited's track record demonstrates significant challenges and failures in adhering to contractual obligations. The fact that they have never won a case raises concerns for potential buyers about the builder's reliability and operational transparency. While legal authorities have intervened to protect consumers, the repeated issues place substantial risk on any prospective investments with Adish Buildcare.
For buyers considering purchasing property from Adish Buildcare, it is essential to exercise due diligence:
In summary, Adish Buildcare Private Limited presents a case study in buyer caution due to substantial complaints and a lack of successful legal defenses against these claims. As the real estate landscape is both promising and perilous, potential buyers must equip themselves with knowledge before entering any contractual obligations.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Adish Buildcare Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around four topics: delayed possession claims, refund and interest disputes, allottee status disputes, and construction completion delays.
Many of the claims made by the applicants focus on the builder's failure to provide possession of flats within the agreed timeframe, leading to claims for delayed possession. These cases often overlap with refund and interest disputes, where applicants seek to recover amounts paid along with interest due to the builder's inability to deliver properties as promised.
A significant number of the builder's defenses revolve around the claim that the applicants were not legitimate allottees, asserting that agreements were executed through fraud and conspiracy. However, the outcomes suggest that this defense was not credible in the eyes of the Authority, as the builder was consistently ordered to return payments along with interest.
The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily include the builder’s inability to meet project timelines and fulfill agreements, resulting in multiple claims for refunds and interest. The builder's frequent assertion of fraud and conspiracy suggests a defensive posture that was not validated by the legal outcomes.
The reasons the builder lost these cases appear to stem from a combination of factors, most notably the failure to honor agreements and provide timely possession of properties. The consistent orders to return payments and pay interest indicate a systemic issue with the builder's operational practices, potentially combined with an inability to present credible evidence of fraud or conspiracy. Overall, these patterns highlight serious concerns about the builder's reliability and the legitimacy of their claims against buyers.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!