CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When selecting a builder for your dream home, it is essential to evaluate their reputation, legal history, and customer satisfaction. In this post, we will take a close look at ADITYA BUILDCON, based on their legal track record, complaints, and overall assessment.
ADITYA BUILDCON operates in the real estate sector in Gujarat. However, they have faced a significant challenge regarding their legal standing with consumers.
According to the data, ADITYA BUILDCON has been involved in one complaint and has lost the associated legal case. The details of this case reveal important insights into the builder's operational practices and regulatory compliance.
In the single case filed against ADITYA BUILDCON, the following claims were made:
The primary factors leading to ADITYA BUILDCON's loss in this legal case include:
Currently, there are no instances of ADITYA BUILDCON winning any legal cases, suggesting that potential customers should be cautious when considering this builder for their housing needs.
Overall, ADITYA BUILDCON shows red flags that potential homebuyers should consider before engaging in a purchase. The solitary legal case lost indicates significant issues with compliance and documentation, which could have serious ramifications for buyers' investments.
In summary, while ADITYA BUILDCON has potential, the existing legal issues highlight the importance of thorough due diligence when purchasing property. As a buyer, ensure you are fully informed and proceed with caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder ADITYA BUILDCON, which it lost, revealed several key insights into the disputes they often encountered.
One primary theme in the cases was the builder's failure to comply with regulations. This includes not providing required documentation which was essential for the project's approval. Regulatory compliance is crucial in the construction sector as it ensures that the builder adheres to local laws and standards. Instances where builders bypass these regulations can lead to severe penalties, as exhibited by the case wherein the authority imposed a penalty on ADITYA BUILDCON for these lapses.
The builder frequently contested penalties imposed by authorities, or sought to argue their case regarding project delays. In the overview of the case, the promoter claimed that the project was complete aside from one unit, which indicates a pattern where ADITYA BUILDCON sought to minimize their financial liabilities. Builders often find themselves in situations where they believe penalties for delays are unwarranted or overly harsh, prompting them to seek redress in court.
The builder's claims of project completion were challenged, which suggests a recurring issue where completion status might be disputed. In litigation, builders may argue that they have fulfilled their obligations, but they could come against counterclaims from regulatory bodies or other parties which assert otherwise. This theme highlights the importance of proper documentation and the establishment of completion metrics that are not solely reliant on the builder's self-assessment.
Patterns that emerge from these summaries indicate that ADITYA BUILDCON commonly brought cases to court due to penalties related to project management and compliance failures. The underlying reasons could be a combination of misconceptions about the legal obligations involved and a lack of thorough documentation to support their claims.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and failures in following interim directions set by the authorities. In essence, these cases underline the need for builders to maintain stringent compliance with regulations, documented project status, and clear communication with all stakeholders involved in the project to avoid litigation and potential penalties in the future.
This dictionary encapsulates the specified themes and provides a comprehensive summary analyzing the disputes involving ADITYA BUILDCON. The emphasis is on understanding the common pitfalls that led to the builder's losses, which could serve as an informative resource for potential buyers in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS/CMP/SM/Vadodara/… | Gujarat | The case involves a real estate project in Gujara… | Non-compliance with… | {"appellant_claim": "The promoter claimed that th… | Aditya Buildcon | Gujarat Real Estate… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ABZqRe8Ix-9c5LqqsleHQIjq2Y8p2eOb |