CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a property investment, potential buyers often gravitate towards builders with solid reputations and positive track records. One such builder to examine is ADITYA BUILDERS, a company that operates primarily in Goa. Below, we'll analyze the builder's legal performance through complaint data while offering insight for prospective buyers.
ADITYA BUILDERS has a relatively low number of complaints, having received only 1 registered complaint to date. The builder has successfully won that case, indicating a favorable outcome for the company. This suggests that potential buyers may not have many major issues or concerns associated with this builder.
A breakdown of the legal case illustrates:
This indicates that ADITYA BUILDERS has navigated the legal landscape effectively, with no losses on record in disputes related to their projects.
Based on the limited data available, ADITYA BUILDERS appears to be a builder with a commendable legal standing. Their record of winning cases and managing complaints efficiently bolsters their reputation among property buyers. The single complaint that was rejected signifies that they operate within the formative norms of the industry and manage their business dealings effectively.
In summary, while ADITYA BUILDERS presents a generally positive outlook based on available legal records, buyers should always conduct thorough due diligence to ensure their investments are sound.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ADITYA BUILDERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases predominantly revolved around refund claims and project completion timelines, with disputes centering on whether certain claims fell within the regulatory purview of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). Most notably, the opposing parties made claims for refunds related to project initiation and the completion status of projects before the implementation of RERA. However, the builder was able to successfully demonstrate that these complaints were not applicable under the mandates of RERA, leading to favorable outcomes in court.
The consistent reasons behind these cases include dissatisfaction from buyers who felt entitled to refunds and contested project completion timelines, largely due to either misguided interpretations of the RERA Act or the timing of project completions in relation to the regulations. The claims often presented by buyers reflected misunderstandings of the legal framework surrounding real estate transactions at that time. For instance, in one case, a claim by a buyer for a refund related to society formation fees was ultimately rejected because the project had been completed prior to the RERA Act coming into effect. This pattern highlights a recurring theme where buyers pursued claims based on misinterpretations or assumptions about builder obligations.
ADITYA BUILDERS' success in these legal battles can be largely attributed to its effective defense against insufficient evidence provided by the opposing parties. In some cases, claims were dismissed because they fell outside the regulatory requirements set forth by RERA, indicating that buyers sometimes lack the necessary legal grounding for their complaints. This reinforces the notion that builders can often successfully navigate legal challenges, even when faced with potentially false or exaggerated claims from dissatisfied buyers or other stakeholders.
From this analysis, it is evident that ADITYA BUILDERS possesses a strong track record in defending itself against what can sometimes be unfounded accusations. This is a reflection not just of individual cases, but of the broader real estate market where disputes may arise from misconceptions or unrealistic expectations. Potential buyers should be aware that while there are legitimate concerns and disputes in the real estate sector, they must also approach claims against builders judiciously. Understanding the nuances of legal frameworks, such as RERA, and seeking reliable information can aid in making informed decisions.
Therefore, as a word of advice to potential buyers: while it's crucial to ensure one’s rights and entitlements are upheld in real estate transactions, it is equally important to engage with credible information and legal understanding. A thorough examination of the builder's past legal standing may often reveal their capacity to counter unjust claims, as seen with ADITYA BUILDERS' ability to safeguard its operations and reputation in the face of disputed allegations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3/RERA/Complaint(11… | Goa | Complainant sought refund of Rs. 26,650 collected… | RERA jurisdiction | {"appellant_claim": "Refund of Rs. 26,650 collect… | Jeronimo Gaspar Alv… | Aditya Builders | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=ydJ1Jh26XbwydDQ/0vUI+Q== |