CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the realm of real estate, the reputation of a builder is a critical factor for potential buyers. One such builder that has made its mark in Rajasthan is Aditya Housing. With a limited number of complaints and legal cases, it's important to analyze their track record to facilitate informed purchasing decisions.
Aditya Housing has been involved in a total of 1 complaint. While this may seem like a low number, the outcome of that single case provides valuable insights into the builder's practices and reliability.
The one case that Aditya Housing has lost involved a penalty imposed for violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, it resulted in a fine of Rs. 5,000 imposed on each of the six respondent promoters for failing to comply with Section 11(2) of the Act.
This indicates a potential issue with regulatory compliance by the builder.
Interestingly, the builder has not won any legal cases despite a singular complaint. This may raise concerns regarding their ability to effectively manage disputes or adhere to legal standards set forth in real estate practices.
In summary, Aditya Housing presents a rather concerning picture for potential buyers. With no victories in court and a case resulting in a penalty for non-compliance, this builder's credibility could be questioned.
Tips for Potential BuyersBy keeping these tips in mind and conducting thorough research, potential buyers can safeguard themselves against possible pitfalls and make well-informed choices in their home-buying journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Aditya Housing, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance and penalties for project delays, highlighting systemic issues within the builder's operations.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, stands out in the verdicts. For instance, the builder was penalized for violating Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, which showcases a concerning pattern of disregard for legal standards. This non-compliance not only incurs financial penalties but also raises questions about the builder's commitment to quality and timeliness in project completion.
The second theme, penalties for project delays, is closely intertwined with the first. Delays often arise from mismanagement or inadequate planning, both of which may stem from non-compliance with regulatory frameworks. In the case of Aditya Housing, the specific reasons for the delays were not detailed in the summaries; however, the pattern of incurring penalties suggests a frequent issue that could be alarming for potential buyers.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the penalties imposed and disputes over the builder's accountability for project delays. Homebuyers may feel aggrieved when projects are not completed on time, leading to unexpected additional costs and inconvenience. The builder’s repeated losses suggest that their defenses have been insufficient, often failing to meet the required standards of evidence or regulatory compliance.
The conclusion drawn from these analyses is that potential buyers should exercise caution when considering Aditya Housing for their real estate needs. The aforementioned patterns indicate a trend of legal issues that could result in further delays or complications down the line. It is crucial for buyers to be informed and vigilant, weighing these factors carefully against the benefits of working with this builder.