| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, it is essential for home buyers to conduct thorough research on builders before making a significant investment. This post focuses on Aditya Infra, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, to assess their track record, complaints, and legal challenges faced by the company. By examining relevant case details, we aim to provide potential buyers with valuable insights before purchasing a property.
Overview of Aditya Infra
Aditya Infra is a builder who has experienced minimal legal challenges, with only one recorded complaint to date. While having a low number of complaints may seem positive at first glance, it is crucial to analyze the specifics of the legal cases Aditya Infra has encountered to understand their implications thoroughly.
Legal Case Details
Cases Against Aditya Infra
- Total Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
This singular complaint involved an appellant who claimed that Aditya Infra failed to submit quarterly reports for their project, 'Pancham Elite', in a timely manner, thus violating the RERA Act. The builder responded by stating they were unaware of the law and had no intention of violating it. Consequently, the final verdict resulted in a fine of Rs. 50,000 imposed on Aditya Infra due to their inadvertent ignorance of the statutory requirements.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases
Given the data, it is evident that Aditya Infra has not won any of the cases filed against them. The single case resulted in a loss, pointing towards possible negligence in adhering to regulatory standards. This raises concerns about the firm's operations and knowledge of legal obligations under the RERA Act, which could potentially place buyers at risk if they fail to understand the builder's legal compliance.
Patterns in Won Cases
Aditya Infra has not won any legal cases to date. This fact suggests a troubling trend for potential buyers, as the lack of victories in legal disputes may indicate a consistent oversight or mismanagement in project execution, alongside their understanding of regulatory compliance.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, Aditya Infra appears to have a concerning legal standing, with a single lost case and no victories to balance the scales. The fine for non-compliance indicates a potential risk for buyers, as it showcases a lack of diligence that could affect project timelines and quality.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before engaging with Aditya Infra or any builder, make sure to research their history, legal standing, and complaints made against them.
- Consult with Legal Experts: It can be beneficial to speak with legal professionals who specialize in real estate to gain insights on the builder's past performance and any potential risks involved.
- Visit Completed Projects: Take the time to visit previous projects by Aditya Infra to assess the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check for Licensing and Certifications: Ensure that the builder holds the necessary licenses and certifications to operate, which can indicate their legitimacy and expertise.
- Read Reviews and Testimonials: Look for reviews from previous customers to gauge their satisfaction and experiences with the builder.
- Ask About Warranty and Post-Sale Support: Understanding the warranty and support offered post-sale can protect your investment and provide peace of mind.
In summary, while Aditya Infra operates under a relatively low number of complaints, their track record in legal disputes raises several concerns. Potential buyers should proceed with caution and conduct diligent research before choosing to invest in properties associated with this builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Aditya Infra, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across their legal disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily centered around non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Act (RERA), penalties incurred due to project delays, and a troubling level of regulatory ignorance demonstrated by the builder.
The non-compliance with RERA Act theme is particularly prevalent, with cases often involving the builder's failure to submit mandatory quarterly project reports on time. As seen in the case of 'Pancham Elite,' this has resulted in fines, emphasizing the legal obligation builders have to maintain transparency in their projects.
People commonly bring cases against Aditya Infra primarily due to the builder's failure to adhere to legal standards, resulting in penalties that contest the builder’s accountability. The patterns emerging from these disputes often revolve around the builder's defense of ignorance—a claim that they were unaware of the laws governing their actions. This defense indicates a systemic issue within the company's operational practices and highlights the need for better education and training regarding regulatory compliance.
The underlying reason for Aditya Infra's losses in these cases can be attributed to their consistent non-compliance with legal requirements, coupled with a lack of due diligence with respect to their regulatory obligations. By failing to comply with the RERA Act and other relevant laws, the builder has not only incurred financial penalties but has also eroded trust with their clients and within the legal community.
In conclusion, prospective buyers should exercise caution when considering Aditya Infra for their real estate needs. The aforementioned themes and patterns suggest a builder that has struggled with adherence to critical regulations, which may lead to further disruptions down the line, including potential delays in project completions and unanticipated costs associated with legal disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1500-232/2018 | Gujarat | The promoter, Aditya Infra, failed to submit quar… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Aditya Infra | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Q9dByoAYU3UnVhxgJCzCYI2QpFp8FTV_ |