CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a real estate investment, potential buyers often turn to reviews and legal records to evaluate the reliability of builders. This article focuses on Advantage Real Estate, a builder active in Bihar, shedding light on their legal track record and providing insights for prospective buyers.
Advantage Real Estate has only one case on record where they prevailed, demonstrating that while they may not have a history of winning cases, this particular case did showcase their ability to defend against claims regarding project naming. The resolution primarily focused on administrative correction rather than substantive issues pertaining to the quality or delivery of their projects.
Despite the single case lost being omitted in detail, the absence of any record of a case won indicates a concerning trend for buyers. This could suggest a potential vulnerability in contractual or operational practices of Advantage Real Estate. The existing complaint indicates a lack of clarity or possible misrepresentation, which could be red flags for buyers.
In summary, Advantage Real Estate has a questionable track record marked by a significant number of complaints and an inability to win legal cases, as evidenced by their one case lost. This raises concerns about their operational practices and adherence to legal commitments. Potential buyers should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence before proceeding with any transactions.
By taking these steps, buyers can better navigate the complexities of the real estate market, especially when considering builders like Advantage Real Estate.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Advantage Real Estate, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes can primarily be categorized into two main topics: Project Representation Disputes and Regulatory Compliance Issues.
Project Representation Disputes revolve around the builder's representation of their projects. In one significant case, the respondent claimed that the name of the party was wrongly mentioned, and the project was initially advertised with a different name. This highlights an issue where buyers may feel misled by inconsistent project naming, leading to loss of trust and legal action.
Regulatory Compliance Issues bring to attention the builder's obligations to adhere to legal standards and requirements. The verdict in the mentioned case mandated the builder to correct the project name and imposed a penalty for non-compliance, demonstrating the legal system's emphasis on proper project classification and naming conventions.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include the builder's failure to maintain consistent project representations and non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Buyers may contest penalties imposed for delays or disputes over project naming, indicating a trend where builders may not fully align with the expectations of their clients or the law.
The builder's losses in these cases primarily stem from insufficient adherence to legal or regulatory guidelines, resulting in judicial mandates for correction and the imposition of penalties. This underscores the importance for builders to ensure thorough compliance and consistent representation in their projects to avoid legal ramifications.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!