CIN | U45201MP1997PLC012427 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | AAKRITI HOUSE, E-8 EXTENSION, AAKRITI ECO CITY, IN FRONT THE NEST AAKRITI ECO CITY, BAWADIA KALAN BHOPAL Bhopal MP 462026 IN |
Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the real estate market, choosing the right builder is paramount for a smooth purchasing experience. This blog post delves into AG8 VENTURES LIMITED, examining their legal track record, including complaints and cases won or lost, to assist potential buyers in making informed decisions.
AG8 VENTURES LIMITED has a minimal complaint history, with only one recorded complaint. However, it is crucial to note that the builder has lost the only case filed against them, raising red flags regarding their reliability. The company operates solely in the state of Madhya Pradesh, making it essential for local buyers to consider their legal standing before committing to a property.
The single case against AG8 VENTURES LIMITED involved an appellant who sought a refund of an advance payment amounting to Rs. 43,07,769/- along with compensation for delays in possession of a flat. The builder's defense hinged on attributing the delay to unforeseen circumstances. However, the authority ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering AG8 VENTURES to refund the amount stated along with interest and compensation for mental distress.
The lone case lost by AG8 VENTURES LIMITED showcases a significant issue- delays in property possession. This pattern suggests potential operational weaknesses in project management or unmet deadlines, which can be detrimental to buyer satisfaction and financial security. Buyers should scrutinize the promises made regarding project timelines and the builder's ability to adhere to them, especially given this illustrated challenge.
Interestingly, while AG8 VENTURES LIMITED has experienced a loss in the one legal case recorded, they also navigated a case involving a claim for compensation. In that ruling, the authority recognized the applicant's legitimate concerns and compensated them accordingly. This dictates that AG8 VENTURES LIMITED may struggle with legal disputes surrounding project delays, which can have lasting impacts on their reputation and client trust.
In conclusion, the legal history of AG8 VENTURES LIMITED displays cautionary aspects for potential buyers. With one complaint and one legal loss, there is a clear implication that the builder may face challenges regarding project delivery and adherence to timelines.
By arming yourself with information and ensuring due diligence, you can mitigate risks and make informed decisions when selecting a builder like AG8 VENTURES LIMITED.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against AG8 Ventures Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes presented. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, resulting in plaintiffs seeking refunds on advance payments and compensation for mental distress caused by the delays.
One of the most notable themes is the builder's inability to meet project timelines, which directly spawned multiple delayed possession claims. In the sole example outlined, the applicant sought a refund of Rs. 43,07,769/- due to the builder's failure to deliver property on time. This case illustrates a common reason for litigation in real estate, where buyers often find themselves in disputes over delays attributed to builders, particularly when those delays are defended with vague claims of 'unforeseen circumstances.'
Besides timely delivery, the notion of compensation for mental damages and litigation expenses stands out in these cases. Courts have increasingly recognized the emotional and psychological ramifications that buyers face when contracts are not honored promptly. Thus, the verdicts often include provisions for emotional distress and legal fees, acknowledging the broader impacts on buyers beyond mere financial losses.
The builder's defense in these cases typically hinges on external factors rather than acknowledging systemic issues within their operations. However, the consistent failure to convince courts of their position suggests a deeper problem, such as inadequate project management or financial instability limiting their ability to conclude projects on schedule.
In conclusion, the cases against AG8 Ventures Limited highlight critical issues potential buyers should consider. Buyers must conduct thorough due diligence, looking for builders with a proven track record of timely project completion. It is advisable to examine any previous litigation, understanding the outcomes and the builder’s defenses in those cases. A close review of contract terms, particularly clauses related to delays and compensation, is also essential. An informed decision can significantly mitigate the risk of encountering similar frustrations down the line.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!