AGA INFACON LLP

AGA INFACON LLP: Understanding Builder Performance and Insights for Potential Buyers

When considering a builder for your next property purchase, it's crucial to analyze their track record, especially in legal matters that pertain to their business operations. In this post, we will delve into AGA INFACON LLP, a builder based in Gujarat, reviewing their performance based on legal cases, overall reputation, and offering some insights for potential buyers.

Legal Standing of AGA INFACON LLP

AGA INFACON LLP has a relatively simple legal profile:

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0

This indicates that the builder has a positive outcome in legal disputes, which is certainly a favorable aspect to consider when evaluating their reliability. To further understand their standing, let's dive into the details of the case that they lost.

Legal Case Insights

In one notable case against AGA INFACON LLP, the complainant sought a declaration that certain outstanding loans related to their property were paid and that they obtained a final due certificate of Rs. 1500 for their shop (Shop No. G/4). However, the defendants, representing the builder, counter-claimed that they obtained a due certificate of Rs. 500 for the same shop and effectively discharged the burden on the shop.

The verdict stated that the defendants had indeed obtained a due certificate and had discharged the burden on the complainant's shop. Notably, no order was passed in this appeal, indicating that while the builder did not lose money in this case, it did show a complication in financial claims related to the property.

Patterns in Cases

• Common Factors in Lost Case:
  • 1. Conflicts over financial claims regarding property financing.
  • 2. Disputes over the due certificates issued by the bank.
  • 3. Legal ambiguity surrounding the financial obligations of the parties involved.
• Common Factors in Won Cases:

  AGA INFACON LLP has not lost any other cases despite only one recorded complaint. This indicates a strong defense against claims and a potential reputation for resolving disputes favorably, at least in terms of official legal outcomes.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of AGA INFACON LLP

Based on the provided data, AGA INFACON LLP appears to maintain a sound legal standing with a significant ability to navigate challenges posed by plaintiff claims effectively. The singular complaint against the builder, coupled with a win in their sole case, suggests that they are likely attentive to legal compliance and may address buyer concerns promptly. However, the presence of financial disputes related to property should be noted by potential buyers as a point for further inquiry.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you're considering purchasing from AGA INFACON LLP, here are some insightful tips:

1. Inquire about Financial Matters: Ask for clarity on all financial obligations and any outstanding dues tied to the property you're considering.
2. Review Legal History: Although the builder has won more cases than they have lost, understanding their legal history can lend insight into how they manage disputes.
3. Consult Other Buyers: Reach out to previous buyers for their experiences, as firsthand accounts can offer valuable information not found in legal records.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

When selecting a builder, here are general tips to keep in mind:

1. Research Their Reputation: Look for customer reviews and testimonials to gauge the builder’s reliability and quality of work.
2. Examine Legal Records: Analyze the builder's legal history to understand how many disputes they have faced and how they resolved them.
3. Visit Finished Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder's completed projects to evaluate the quality and craftsmanship firsthand.

In conclusion, while AGA INFACON LLP shows a positive legal performance overall, buyers should remain vigilant and conduct thorough due diligence before making a purchase decision.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder AGA INFACON LLP, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around disputes over due certificates related to outstanding loans for properties owned by complainants. In these cases, the opposing parties were making claims concerning the validity of loan payments and the associated due certificates. The summary indicates that complaints frequently arose from misunderstandings regarding financial obligations attached to property ownership, particularly regarding shops held by individuals questioning the builder's execution of financial responsibilities.

The cases can be grouped under a few common themes:

• Disputes over Due Certificates: Many complaints pointed to the issuance of due certificates for outstanding loans, where the complainants sought declarations of payments that the builder contested.
• Claims of Outstanding Loans: These cases frequently involved arguments over whether loans had been sufficiently discharged or not, highlighting a common contention among property owners regarding their financial clarity.
• Disputes Regarding Shop Ownership: The ownership of specific shops and the financial liabilities attached to them emerged as a significant element in these disputes.

Several overarching reasons led to these disputes being brought to court. Many cases were rooted in contesting penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over financial documentation related to property ownership. A persistent pattern emerged reflecting frustrations from buyers about their understanding of the financial obligations tied to their properties, which sometimes led to legal grievances against the builder.

On the other hand, AGA INFACON LLP consistently emerged victorious in these legal battles. The common reasons for their success included:

• Insufficient Evidence: The opposing parties often failed to provide enough substantiation for their claims, allowing the builder to challenge the validity of disputes.
• Compliance with Legal Standards: The builder presented evidence of compliance with contractual and regulatory obligations, which was crucial in defending against claims.
• Misunderstandings of Financial Classification: Many complaints stemmed from misunderstandings of loan agreements or financial obligations, which the builder effectively clarified during proceedings.

This analysis highlights that AGA INFACON LLP possesses a commendable reputation for legally defending itself against what appear to be exaggerated or unfounded claims. The broader real estate market is subsequently informed by such dynamics, indicating that buyers may sometimes resort to legal action based on misunderstandings rather than legitimate grievances. It’s a reminder of the importance of clarity in financial transactions and the nature of real estate agreements.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach property transactions with caution and diligence. The analysis indicates that while disputes in the real estate market can be valid, builders like AGA INFACON LLP demonstrate a robust capacity to defend their practices and operate lawfully. Buyers should make informed decisions and critically assess claims before forming negative opinions about a builder's reputation.