CIN | U70200DL2009PTC194246 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 403, 4TH FLOOR, SACHDEVA CORPORATE TOWER, PLOT NO. - 17, DDA COMMUNITY CENTER, KAR KARDOOMA , DELHI, Delhi, India - 110092 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate sector, buyers often seek reliable builders who can deliver projects with integrity and timely execution. One such builder, AGC Realty Private Limited, operates primarily in Uttar Pradesh. However, it has faced a series of legal challenges that potential buyers need to be aware of.
AGC Realty Private Limited has incurred two legal complaints, both of which they lost. The cases primarily revolved around issues related to the non-delivery of property possession within an agreed timeframe, which is a critical concern for any real estate investor.
In both cases filed against AGC Realty, the appellants claimed that the builder failed to deliver possession of the flat within the stipulated period. They sought a refund of the amount deposited along with interest and compensation. The respondent (AGC Realty) contended that the project was not required to be registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and hence believed that the appellants were not entitled to a refund. Unfortunately for the builder, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, directing AGC Realty to refund a significant amount of Rs. 75,87,757/- with additional interest from the date of deposit until actual refund and to pay monthly compensation.
Based on the available data, AGC Realty Private Limited appears to be struggling with significant challenges related to project delivery. With two lost legal cases and no victories to balance the scale, potential buyers should approach investments with caution, considering the implications of delayed possession and financial repercussions that have previously affected others.
In conclusion, while AGC Realty Private Limited has potential, the current legal challenges suggest a need for unitary attention to project delivery timelines. Prospective buyers should weigh these factors heavily before making any commitments to ensure that they are protected and their investments are secure.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against AGC Realty Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.
The cases primarily revolved around two key themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Refund and Compensation Disputes. In each instance, the appellants claimed that the builder failed to deliver possession of their flats within the agreed-upon time frame. This delay led to demands for refunds of the amounts deposited, along with interest and compensation for the distress and financial burdens caused by the delays.
A recurring pattern in these cases was the builder's defense, which often hinged on their claim that the project was not required to be registered with RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority). The builder contended that this lack of registration meant that the appellants were not entitled to refunds. However, the Tribunal did not accept this defense and ruled in favor of the appellants in both cases.
The common triggers for litigation in these cases were clear: the failure to adhere to promised timelines and the inability of the builder to fulfill contractual obligations regarding project completion and possession delivery. The builders’ consistent reliance on a misleading interpretation of RERA compliance further aggravated the disputes, as it reflected a lack of understanding of the regulatory framework surrounding real estate projects.
The underlying reason for the builder's losses in these cases was rooted in their failure to meet the standards set by RERA and their inability to provide valid reasons for the possession delays. The Tribunal's decisions highlight the importance of transparency and adherence to regulatory requirements in the real estate sector.
In conclusion, potential buyers considering projects by AGC Realty Private Limited should exercise caution. The patterns observed in these cases indicate a concerning trend of delays and disputes, which could pose risks to prospective purchasers. It is crucial for buyers to be informed and to thoroughly investigate a builder's reputation, track record, and compliance with local regulations before making any commitments.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!