AGRIM INFRA PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When selecting a builder for your dream property, understanding their track record and legal standing is crucial. In this post, we delve into the performance and legal history of Agrim Infra Project Private Limited, focusing on the complaints lodged against them, their legal victories and defeats, and what this means for prospective buyers.

Overview of Agrim Infra Project Private Limited

Agrim Infra Project Private Limited operates primarily in Assam and has a notable record of four complaints lodged against them, out of which they have won one case and lost three.

Legal Case Insights

Winning Cases

The builder has experienced success in one case where they appealed against the directions of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), Assam. The summary of this case indicates that Agrim Infra Project contended that the initial orders were incorrect and sought modification, which was granted, signifying a partial victory for the builder. This outcome demonstrates that the builder has a level of engagement and proactive stance concerning regulatory compliance.

Losing Cases

In contrast, the three cases that Agrim Infra Project lost exhibit a consistent pattern. In each instance, the complainants raised concerns that the builder failed to comply with the final order from the Adjudicating Officer. The builder's defense frequently revolved around the assertion of dues owed by the complainants, requesting an adjustment of these dues and waivers of accrued interest. However, the adjudicating authority ruled against the builder, mandating them to pay compensation with interest within a month in each instance. This suggests potential issues with fulfilling contractual obligations or responding adequately to regulatory judgments, raising concerns for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability.

Analyzing Legal Patterns

Patterns in Lost Cases

The recurring theme in the cases lost by Agrim Infra Project indicates a struggle with compliance regarding the orders set forth by regulatory bodies. Their defense leaned heavily on the argument of owed dues, suggesting possible mismanagement of affairs or disputes over contractual interpretations. The fact that all three lost cases stem from similar circumstances raises red flags about their operational procedures and commitment to obligations.

Patterns in Won Cases

Conversely, the case won by Agrim Infra Project showcases their willingness to challenge RERA orders. The successful modification signifies a proactive approach to regulatory engagement, although it raises questions about the nature of compliance in other situations where they have lost.

Conclusion

Based on the data, Agrim Infra Project Private Limited presents a mixed picture. While there is evidence of proactive engagement with regulatory bodies, the pattern of losing compliance-related disputes raises concerns about their operational reliability. As a potential buyer, it is crucial to consider these factors before making a commitment.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Do Your Research: Investigate the legal history of any builder you're considering, understanding their track record with complaints and resolutions.
• Evaluate Compliance: Be cautious if a builder shows a pattern of non-compliance with regulatory bodies. This could indicate broader operational issues.
• Engage with Current Homeowners: Speak with other buyers in your area or development to gauge their experience with the builder.
• Review Contracts Thoroughly: Ensure that the terms are clear, and seek legal advice if necessary to interpret any complex clauses.
• Seek Professional Guidance: Consider engaging a real estate attorney or expert when navigating complex agreements or disputes.

By staying informed and vigilant, you can make empowered decisions when selecting a builder for your future home.

Analysis of the cases filed against Agrim Infra Project Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three common themes: non-compliance with the Adjudicating Officer's orders, disputes over compensation and interest payments, and claims for dues adjustment along with interest waivers.

The first type of case highlights an alarming trend where the builder failed to comply with the final orders passed by the Adjudicating Officer. This suggests a concerning level of disregard for legal obligations, which could potentially indicate operational dysfunction or a lack of regulatory compliance within the company.

The second theme centers around the builder's disputes over compensation amounts and the interest associated with these payments. In each case, the Adjudicating Officer directed the builder to pay the compensation amount inclusive of interest within a specified timeframe, reinforcing the idea that compensation payments are not only mandatory but also subject to timely execution.

The third theme involves the builder's claims of having dues payable by the complainants. The builder consistently requested adjustments of these dues against their obligations and sought waivers of interest on their payments. However, the outcomes of the cases imply that these claims were not accepted as valid defenses or offsets against their legal obligations, leaving the builder with significant unpaid liabilities.

Common reasons for the builder’s litigation losses include:

• Insufficient evidence to support their claims of dues or to defend against non-compliance allegations.
• A fundamental failure to adhere to the Adjudicating Officer's orders, which reflects a broader issue of non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
• The inability to secure waivers or adjustments that align with their financial claims, potentially due to mismanagement of project finances or misunderstandings of the legal framework surrounding compensation and interest.

In conclusion, this analysis underscores the importance of scrutinizing a builder's legal history and compliance record before engaging in any contractual agreements. Buyers should take note of the recurring themes in Agrim Infra Project Private Limited's cases, as they suggest cautionary patterns that could impact future dealings.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Agrim Infra Project Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes predominantly center around regulatory complaints and the enforcement of orders from the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) in Assam. Notably, one case involved the builder contesting the correctness of directions issued by RERA, seeking a modification of the order dated 31.03.2023, while the opposing party sought its dismissal. In that case, the verdict resulted in a modification favoring the builder, indicating responsiveness to their claims.

These cases mainly revolve around challenges to directives issued by regulatory bodies and reflect a pattern where the builder feels the need to contest decisions that may hinder their operations or projects. The primary reasons Agrim Infra brings these cases to court include disputing what they perceive as unjust regulatory pressures, arguing that the claims or orders from RERA are not compliant with the existing legal framework.

Common reasons for the builder's success in these legal battles stem from the insufficient evidence provided by opposing parties and the misunderstandings of the legal regulations governing real estate transactions. In some instances, the builder may have effectively pointed out flaws in the claims made against them, or highlighted non-compliance with procedural norms by the opposing respondents, thus leading to favorable judgments.

This analysis offers critical insights into Agrim Infra Project Private Limited's operational strategies and its reputation in the real estate market. It underscores a potential trend where developers face challenges from buyers or regulatory frameworks, and are sometimes accused without substantial backing. The builder's ability to successfully counter such claims speaks volumes about their capacity to navigate the legal landscape and defend their interests effectively.

In conclusion, it is essential for potential buyers to approach the real estate market with care and consideration. While it is understandable that disputes can arise, many builders like Agrim Infra Project Private Limited are well-equipped to defend themselves against unjust claims. Buyers are encouraged to seek reliable information and analyzing case histories before forming opinions on a builder's credibility.