| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering purchasing a home, particularly in urban developments, buyers often look to the builder's track record and reputation. In India, the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) is a prominent entity in the real estate sector, particularly in Gujarat. However, a review of AUDA's legal performance reveals some important insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Performance
The Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority faces a concerning legal track record. The data shows that out of two complaints filed against them, AUDA has lost both cases, indicating potential issues in compliance with legal requirements.
Breakdown of Complaints
- Number of Complaints: 2
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
- States with Projects: Gujarat
Detailed Analysis of Legal Cases
Cases Lost
The common factor in the two cases AUDA lost revolves around their failure to submit quarterly reports for the 'EWS Awas' project, as mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) that it lost reveals significant insights into the builder's legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two key themes: non-compliance with the RERA Act and failure to submit quarterly reports.
The first theme encompasses the builder’s obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, which aims to protect the interests of homebuyers and ensure transparency in the real estate market. AUDA faced penalties for failing to adhere to this legislation, specifically by not submitting mandatory quarterly reports for their projects, including 'EWS Awas' and the EWS Housing project.
The reasons for these legal actions were rooted in AUDA's ignorance of the requirements laid out by the RERA Act. The builder claimed a lack of awareness, asserting that the non-compliance was not willful. However, this defense did not mitigate the violations, leading to fines of Rs. 25,000 …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!