CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the ever-evolving real estate sector, buyers must conduct thorough due diligence before making a purchase. One such builder that has garnered attention is AKGINFRATECH Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth analysis of AKGINFRATECH based on legal cases and customer feedback.
AKGINFRATECH Private Limited has been involved in various real estate projects. Like many builders, its reputation can be assessed by examining legal challenges and the outcomes of those cases. As of now, AKGINFRATECH has faced a total of 2 complaints, with a striking record of 0 cases won and 2 cases lost.
Both cases show a potential pattern where procedural issues, specifically related to attendance and communication of requests for adjournments, led to unfavorable outcomes for the builder.
The common factor in the cases lost by AKGINFRATECH appears to be the builder's failure to adequately address procedural requirements and maintain effective communication. The loss in both cases suggests possible shortcomings in the builder's legal representation and awareness of court protocols, raising concerns about their operational efficiency.
Interestingly, while the builder has lost the significant legal challenges against it, the cases reviewed did show procedural victory regarding adjournments. However, this can be interpreted more as an administrative success rather than a triumph over substantive issues.
Based on the data presented, AKGINFRATECH Private Limited displays critical areas of concern that potential homebuyers should consider. Having lost two legal cases suggests a lack of adequate management or oversight in handling complaints, which could translate to similar issues in customer service or project delivery.
Choosing a builder is a significant decision that can greatly affect your home-buying experience. Therefore, informed decisions are crucial for a fruitful real estate investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against AKGINFRATECH Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the board. The cases highlighted two primary themes: adjournment requests and procedural non-compliance.
The first theme, adjournment requests, encompasses instances where the builder's counsel sought to delay proceedings due to personal work or other commitments. In the cases summarized, the builder's attorney requested an adjournment via email on the eve before the scheduled appearance, which indicates a pattern of last-minute communications that may not have aligned with the court's expectations or procedural timelines.
The second theme, procedural non-compliance, is evident in the outcomes of the cases. The builder lost primarily due to the court's decision to recall an order that was passed without considering the adjournment request. This suggests that the initial proceeding may have expedited without adequately acknowledging the builder's attempt to seek a delay, thus highlighting a procedural misstep.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this scenario include contesting the procedural handling of adjournment requests and the implications of such handling on the builder's right to due process. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that the builder's litigation often stems from a combination of procedural misunderstandings and possibly insufficient adherence to established legal protocols.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to factors like insufficient procedural compliance and a failure to ensure that their requests were considered within the appropriate timelines. The court's decision to recall the order and restore the appeal suggests that the builder's rights were ultimately acknowledged, but the initial non-compliance led to unnecessary litigation, underscoring the importance of procedural adherence in legal proceedings.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RA-623/2021 | Uttar Pradesh | The appeal was recalled due to sufficient cause s… | ["Recall of order"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Prasoon Rastogi | AKGINFRATECH Privat… | ['https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8xMTI4MTI2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8yMDg5NDc2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8zNTk3NzA2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy84NjAxNjg2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8zMDM0MDQ2MDkgb2YgMjAyMC5wZGY='] |