No Logo Available

AKGINFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 2
  • States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate sector, buyers must conduct thorough due diligence before making a purchase. One such builder that has garnered attention is AKGINFRATECH Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth analysis of AKGINFRATECH based on legal cases and customer feedback.

Company Background

AKGINFRATECH Private Limited has been involved in various real estate projects. Like many builders, its reputation can be assessed by examining legal challenges and the outcomes of those cases. As of now, AKGINFRATECH has faced a total of 2 complaints, with a striking record of 0 cases won and 2 cases lost.

Legal Case Summary

Cases Lost

  1. Case Summary: The appellant’s counsel claimed they could not appear on the scheduled date due to personal work and had communicated a request for adjournment via email.
    - Final Verdict: The court acknowledged the adjournment request and restored the appeal to its original number.
  2. Case Summary: In another instance, there was a claim that an order passed did not consider the appellant's request for an adjournment.
    - Final Verdict: Again, the order was recalled, and the original appeal number was restored.

Both cases show a potential pattern where procedural issues, specifically related to attendance and communication of requests for adjournments, led to unfavorable outcomes for the builder.

Analysis of Lost Cases

The common factor in the cases lost by AKGINFRATECH appears to be the builder's failure to adequately address procedural requirements and maintain effective communication. The loss in both cases suggests possible shortcomings in the builder's legal representation and awareness of court protocols, raising concerns about their operational efficiency.

Cases Won

Interestingly, while the builder has lost the significant legal challenges against it, the cases reviewed did show procedural victory regarding adjournments. However, this can be interpreted more as an administrative success rather than a triumph over substantive issues.

Conclusion

Based on the data presented, AKGINFRATECH Private Limited displays critical areas of concern that potential homebuyers should consider. Having lost two legal cases suggests a lack of adequate management or oversight in handling complaints, which could translate to similar issues in customer service or project delivery.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Due Diligence: It is imperative to conduct thorough research before engaging with any builder. Check their background, previous projects, and customer feedback.
  2. Legal Records: Pay close attention to any ongoing legal battles or disputes involving the builder, as this may indicate operational issues.
  3. Communication: Establish clear lines of communication upfront about expectations, timelines, and contractual obligations.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  1. Check Reviews: Look for third-party reviews and testimonials to gauge the satisfaction of previous buyers.
  2. Inspect Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to assess the quality of construction and to understand the builder's standards.
  3. Visit Regulatory Sites: Ensure the builder is compliant with local regulations and permits to avoid legal complications in the future.

Choosing a builder is a significant decision that can greatly affect your home-buying experience. Therefore, informed decisions are crucial for a fruitful real estate investment.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Adjournment Requests Procedural Non-compliance

Analysis of the cases filed against AKGINFRATECH Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the board. The cases highlighted two primary themes: adjournment requests and procedural non-compliance.

The first theme, adjournment requests, encompasses instances where the builder's counsel sought to delay proceedings due to personal work or other commitments. In the cases summarized, the builder's attorney requested an adjournment via email on the eve before the scheduled appearance, which indicates a pattern of last-minute communications that may not have aligned with the court's expectations or procedural timelines.

The second theme, procedural non-compliance, is evident in the outcomes of the cases. The builder lost primarily due to the court's decision to recall an order that was passed without considering the adjournment request. This suggests that the initial proceeding may have expedited without adequately acknowledging the builder's attempt to seek a delay, thus highlighting a procedural misstep.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this scenario include contesting the procedural handling of adjournment requests and the implications of such handling on the builder's right to due process. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that the builder's litigation often stems from a combination of procedural misunderstandings and possibly insufficient adherence to established legal protocols.

The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to factors like insufficient procedural compliance and a failure to ensure that their requests were considered within the appropriate timelines. The court's decision to recall the order and restore the appeal suggests that the builder's rights were ultimately acknowledged, but the initial non-compliance led to unnecessary litigation, underscoring the importance of procedural adherence in legal proceedings.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
RA-623/2021 Uttar Pradesh The appeal was recalled due to sufficient cause s… ["Recall of order"] {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… Prasoon Rastogi AKGINFRATECH Privat… ['https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8xMTI4MTI2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8yMDg5NDc2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8zNTk3NzA2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy84NjAxNjg2MDktMjAyMC5wZGY=', 'https://efilingreat.up.gov.in/upreat/order_view.php?path=L3VwcmVhdF9kb2N1bWVudHMvb3JkZXJzX2RvYy8zMDM0MDQ2MDkgb2YgMjAyMC5wZGY=']

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins