A.K.S. INFRATECH

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, potential home buyers often find themselves weighing numerous factors before selecting their ideal builder. A.K.S. Infratech, operating specifically in Chhattisgarh, has come under scrutiny due to several legal disputes. This article delves into the builder's track record, analyzing their legal cases and offering insights for prospective buyers.

Builder Overview

A.K.S. Infratech, known for its construction projects in Chhattisgarh, has faced a total of four complaints, resulting in an equal split of victories and losses in legal cases: two cases won and two cases lost. This mixed record prompts a closer examination of the specifics behind these complaints and the potential implications for future dealings with the builder.

Legal Case Details

Cases Lost

Among the two cases lost, several commonalities emerge:

1. Appeals from Applicants: The primary issue raised by the applicants involved delays in possession. Homeowners sought relief due to what they perceived as …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against A.K.S. Infratech, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, quality of construction disputes, and payment disputes involving allegations of unfair profits.

The delayed possession claims primarily revolve around the builder's failure to complete constructions on time, with applicants often attributing the delays to the builder's inefficiencies. In contrast, the builder consistently claimed that the delays were due to incomplete payments from the applicants, which highlights a significant communication gap between the parties involved.

Quality of construction disputes were also prominent, with applicants claiming that the work done was of poor quality. This raises concerns about the builder's adherence to construction standards and regulations, which could potentially impact the safety and durability of the properties developed.

Payment disputes took center stage in several cases, where applicants accused the builder …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, A.K.S. Infratech, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The cases primarily revolved around claims of delayed possession of properties, notably categorized as 'Delayed Possession Claims'.

In these disputes, the applicants argued that the builder had not delivered possession on time, while the builder consistently maintained that the construction was completed and that possession had been taken without full payment from the applicants.

This situation showcases a recurring theme where payment disputes often overlapped with claims of construction delays, thereby indicating potential misunderstandings between buyers and the builder regarding payment schedules and possession timelines.

Furthermore, the reasons behind the initiation of these cases often stemmed from buyers contesting perceived delays alongside disputes over outstanding payment amounts.

In both instances summarized, the applicants sought relief due to what they termed as delays in possession, illustrating a common grievance among property buyers …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis