ALHASSAN INFRASTRUCTURE LLP

Introduction

In the realm of real estate development, selecting a reliable builder is crucial for ensuring that your investment pays off. Today, we take a close look at Alhassan Infrastructure LLP, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. This analysis aims to shed light on this builder's legal record, complaints, and overall credibility.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

Alhassan Infrastructure LLP has recorded one complaint filed against them. Notably, they have not won any cases, while one case has concluded with a loss for the builder. This paints a picture of the builder’s dealings, hinting at possible challenges in addressing customer grievances.

Summary of Legal Cases

1. Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that the builder had failed to provide the correct name for the project, requesting a rename from 'Fasneen Residence' to 'Hasneen Residence'.
2. Respondent Claim: Alhassan Infrastructure LLP argued that 'Fasneen Residence' was indeed the correct name, claiming that the appellant lacked sufficient evidence for the requested name change.
3. Final Verdict: The authority adjudicating the matter granted the complaint, stating that the appellant must submit a revised complaint along with a copy to the builder within 15 days.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

Examining the sole legal loss, it appears that the nature of the complaint revolved around a misunderstanding regarding project naming. The builder failed to adequately defend against the claim, indicating a potential deficiency in communication or documentation regarding project details.

Cases Won

Interestingly, while there is one case where the builder was involved, they did not emerge victorious, which hints at possible challenges in their legal strategies. It’s important to analyze how effectively the builder can address disputes, as this can greatly affect customer trust.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Alhassan Infrastructure LLP presents a mixed bag for potential buyers. With one complaint lodged and a complete lack of successful legal defenses, prospective customers should proceed with caution. It’s crucial to undertake thorough due diligence before making any commitments.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate any builder's history, customer reviews, and legal records. Alhassan Infrastructure LLP's performance raises questions worth exploring further.
2. Engage with Current Residents: If possible, speak to residents of projects by Alhassan Infrastructure to gauge their satisfaction and any potential issues faced during their purchasing process.
3. Documentation is Key: Ensure that all contract details are clear, especially concerning project names and specifications, to avoid any miscommunication.
4. Consult Legal Experts: Before finalizing any property purchase or investment, consulting with a legal professional could safeguard against future disputes.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

1. Check for Complaints: Review any complaints filed against the builder with regulatory bodies to understand common pitfalls.
2. Assess Track Records: Look for builders with a higher winning frequency in legal disputes as this often reflects a builder's accountability and reliability.
3. Ask About After-Sales Service: Ensure there is a clear understanding of the support and services offered post-purchase, as this can significantly affect your experience.
4. Stay Informed: Keep up to date with the real estate market and familiarize yourself with terms used in real estate agreements to protect yourself.

In conclusion, while Alhassan Infrastructure LLP is active in Gujarat, the single complaint and lack of successful legal outcomes suggest caution is warranted for prospective buyers.

Analysis of the cases filed against Alhassan Infrastructure LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases highlight key areas of dispute, primarily revolving around project naming and the builder's failure to provide sufficient evidence to support their position.

One of the main types of disputes involved the naming of the project. In the case of 'Fasneen Residence,' the appellant sought to change the name to 'Hasneen Residence,' claiming that the original name was incorrect. This indicates a pattern where parties may contest project details that they believe are misrepresented or inaccurate, which can lead to significant disputes, particularly if not resolved promptly.

A common reason for the builder’s litigation in these cases was the lack of sufficient evidence to defend their actions or decisions—such as the choice of project name. In the 'Fasneen Residence' case, for example, the builder claimed that the name was correct, but the authority ultimately ruled in favor of the appellant, indicating that the builder's evidence was insufficient to support their claim. This highlights a crucial pattern: when builders cannot provide adequate documentation or rationale for their decisions, they are more likely to lose cases brought against them.

The outcomes of these cases also suggest that non-compliance with regulatory requirements or failure to adhere to authority decisions can worsen the builder's position significantly. In scenarios where builders do not fulfill the directives of the governing bodies, such as submitting revised complaints or project details within specified timelines, they may face additional penalties or repercussions that could have been avoided.

In conclusion, the cases against Alhassan Infrastructure LLP serve as a reminder to builders about the importance of meticulous record-keeping, ensuring compliance with all regulatory requirements, and responding adequately to complaints raised by other parties. Buyers considering projects from this builder should take these legal disputes into account and conduct thorough research to understand any potential implications for their investment.