CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a real estate investment, it's crucial to evaluate the reputation and reliability of the builder involved. One such entity in Tamil Nadu is ALLIANCE BUSINESS PARKS Private Limited, operating under the name ALLIANCE PROJECTS. This blog post dives into the performance indicators and legal standing of Alliance Business Parks based on available data.
Alliance Business Parks has engaged in various residential projects in Tamil Nadu. However, the company has a notable complaint record, having received one complaint with a verdict that did not favor them. There is an important distinction to be made here: the builder's failure to win any legal disputes might raise red flags for potential buyers.
The legal case against Alliance Business Parks provides us with insight into their operational challenges:
Evaluating Alliance Business Parks, it is clear that their reputation may have been impacted negatively due to the single complaint on record and the implications of their loss in court. Potential buyers should approach with caution, considering the existing issues surrounding project completion and payment disputes.
In summary, due diligence is vital when selecting a builder, and potential buyers of Alliance Business Parks should be particularly attentive to the company’s legal history and complaint resolution practices. By approaching the situation with careful research and proactive measures, buyers can help safeguard their investments and minimize potential risks.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Alliance Business Parks Private Limited and Alliance Projects, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment schedules and interest charges.
In the case of delayed possession claims, the complainant often cited that they had completed their payment obligations according to the stage-wise payment schedule, yet the builder failed to hand over the property on time. This points to an apparent mismanagement or inability of the builder to fulfill their commitments, leading to legitimate claims from buyers.
The disputes over payment schedules and interest charges typically involve the builder claiming that buyers defaulted on timely payments, which led to accusations of delayed payment interest and other charges. However, the ruling often favored the complainants, indicating that the builder's claims may have been exaggerated or based on a flawed understanding of the payment agreements.
A common reason people brought cases to court was to contest what they perceived as unfair penalties for delays, which they attributed to the builder's inability to deliver properties on schedule. There was also a prevalent dispute over the interpretation of payment schedules and interest calculation methods, highlighting a significant communication gap between the builder and the buyers.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a failure to honor the terms of the construction agreement. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of delayed payments or non-compliance with the agreed payment schedules resulted in rulings against them. Moreover, the builder's continued insistence on charging interest and other fees after buyers had fulfilled their payment obligations appears to have undermined their credibility in the eyes of the law, leading to their losses in court.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C.No.86/2022 | Tamil Nadu | The complainant, Tmt. R. Saratha, filed a complai… | ["Delayed Payment",… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Tmt. R. Saratha | Alliance Business P… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2022/86-2022.pdf |