CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Almas Builders & Developers operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh and has made an impact in the real estate market. However, their reputation is marred by complaints and legal disputes that potential buyers might want to consider.
Of the legal matters concerning Almas Builders & Developers, they have faced a total of three cases in which they were definitively at a loss, with no cases won. The nature of complaints filed against the builder indicates serious issues related to possession of flats. Here’s a detailed overview of the cases:
Considering the provided statistics and case details, Almas Builders & Developers show a troubled track record in resolving complaints satisfactorily. With three lost cases demonstrating their failure to perform contractual obligations, potential buyers should exercise caution.
In summary, while Almas Builders & Developers may have projects within Madhya Pradesh, their legal history urges caution for prospective buyers. It is vital to conduct thorough due diligence to avoid potential pitfalls.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Almas Builders & Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Refund and Compensation Disputes, and Project Registration and Compliance. Each of these themes highlights critical issues that buyers faced, leading to legal recourse.
Delayed Possession Claims encompassed the majority of the cases, where buyers claimed they were not provided timely possession of their flats. For instance, in one case, a buyer paid Rs. 20,00,000 for a flat but faced a lack of possession, leading to the court awarding interest and compensation for mental distress. This theme underscores a frequent complaint among buyers regarding the builder's inability to adhere to project timelines.
Refund and Compensation Disputes arose when buyers sought refunds due to the non-delivery of possession. In one significant case, a buyer claimed a refund for the Rs. 76,02,000 paid for a flat in the "Almas Atlantis" project. The builder's defense—that the project was not registered in RERA and thus buyers were not entitled to refunds—was ultimately inadequate, as the court ruled in favor of the buyer, citing the builder's failure to provide possession as grounds for refund and compensation.
Project Registration and Compliance points to the builder's errors regarding regulatory requirements. The case mentioned above illustrates this theme, where the builder's lack of RERA registration led to a ruling against them, demonstrating a pattern of non-compliance that further aggravated buyer grievances.
Common reasons for buyers to bring cases against the builder included contesting delayed possession, seeking refunds, and claiming compensation for mental distress and financial burdens. The builder's recurrent losses in these cases highlight a troubling pattern of customer dissatisfaction and legal mismanagement.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with RERA registration, and a lack of timely possession delivery. The rulings suggest a systemic issue within the builder's operations, which failed to prioritize buyer needs and adherence to regulatory frameworks. Understanding these themes and reasons for the builder's losses can provide potential buyers with critical insights, enabling them to make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary pitfalls in their property investments.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!