An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily center around three recurring themes:

1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many cases revolve around the timelines for possession and related compensation. The builder often contended that possession was offered promptly after the completion certificate was issued, arguing that the claims of delayed possession were unsubstantiated.
2. Completion Certificate Issues: The builder frequently defended itself based on the argument that a completion certificate was already issued by July 2015, thereby claiming that the legal provisions of the real estate act were not applicable to their projects. This served as a key point in countering claims made by allottee respondents.
3. Disputes Over Applicability of Legal Provisions: The builder maintained that the conditions outlined in the Act were not relevant to their case, primarily because they fulfilled the legal requirements by obtaining the necessary completion certificates.

The common reasons the builder brought these cases to court include contesting penalties and disputing project delays, which they often attributed to external factors or misinterpretations of their performance. The frequent invocation of the completion certificate signifies a consistent strategy to mitigate liability regarding possession delays.

The builder won these cases mainly due to several factors: the respondents often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, which weakened their positions in court. In addition, there were instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory framework by the opposing parties, which hampered their ability to argue effectively against the builder's claims. The frequently cited completion certificate served as a strong point in the builder's defense.

This analytical overview points to a resilient reputation for Alpha Corp Development Private Limited in navigating disputes within the real estate market. The outcomes indicate that while buyers may sometimes make exaggerated or unfounded accusations, the builder has demonstrated a robust track record of defending itself. This reality serves as a reminder that all disputes need to be contextualized and assessed based on their merits.

To potential buyers, it is crucial to approach real estate transactions with discernment and a reliance on solid information. Although legitimate disputes exist, the cases analyzed impart good insight into how builders like Alpha Corp Development Private Limited can successfully contest baseless claims. Therefore, it is vital for buyers to conduct thorough research and form opinions based on evidence, rather than solely on allegations or disputes that may not reflect the overall performance and reliability of a builder.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be categorized into a few recurring themes that shed light on the nature of disputes involving Alpha Corp Development Private Limited.

1. Withdrawal of Complaints: A significant number of cases involved complainants seeking to withdraw their appeals or complaints, often with the intention of filing afresh before a competent authority. This indicates a possible trend of buyers reconsidering their disputes or seeking resolution outside the courtroom, reflecting an aspect of buyer psychology in the real estate market.
2. Possession and Refund Claims: Some complainants sought possession of property and refund of holding charges. The builder defended these claims by demonstrating that the offer of possession was valid and that holding charges were permissible, indicating that the builder maintained proper legal protocol and communications concerning property dealings.
3. Rectification Application Dismissals: Several cases revolved around the requests for the correction of deemed dates of possession, which were dismissed on the grounds that the Authority lacked the power to review final orders. This highlights the importance of adhering to established protocols and regulations in real estate transactions.
4. Settled Cases: A number of cases were categorized as disposed of as settled, suggesting that these disputes were resolved amicably without necessitating a court decision. This can often signify that parties may have reached an understanding outside the rigid framework of litigation, which can be seen as a positive resolution method in real estate conflicts.

The reasons behind these cases often stem from buyers contesting penalties, claiming project delays, or expressing disagreements over land classifications. A common pattern exhibited through these summaries is that buyers may sometimes bring forth complaints that could stem from misunderstandings or insufficient documentation regarding their claims.

When examining why the builder won these cases, it is notable that a consistent factor was insufficient evidence from the opposing party or failure to comply with necessary legal requirements. The Authority's dismissal of rectification applications based on jurisdiction issues and the lack of opposition to withdrawal requests underscore that Alpha Corp Development Private Limited effectively managed to defend itself against various claims, some of which appeared to be unfounded.

This analysis paints a picture of Alpha Corp Development Private Limited as a builder with a strong capability to handle legal disputes, suggesting a reputation for following legal norms and standards in its business practices. It is essential for potential buyers to consider that while legitimate concerns often arise in the real estate market, there are instances where accusations against builders may not reflect the actual situation.

In conclusion, potential buyers need to make informed decisions when navigating the complexities of real estate transactions. This analysis demonstrates that Alpha Corp Development Private Limited has a robust track record of successfully defending itself against unjust claims. Buyers should approach complaints with due diligence and consider seeking reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.