CIN | U72900DL2007PTC157429 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 17, NEW ROHTAK ROAD, KAROL BAGH, , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110005 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a builder for your real estate investment, understanding their legal history and client interactions can provide invaluable insights. In this post, we will analyze the legal performance of Alta Vista Info Solutions Private Limited, exploring their strengths and weaknesses in the face of litigation, along with recommendations for potential buyers.
Alta Vista Info Solutions is a builder operating primarily in Haryana. With a total of four complaints lodged against them, the builder has faced equal outcomes in legal disputes, winning two cases and losing two cases.
Both cases where Alta Vista Info Solutions lost revolved around claims made by the complainants against delays in development and issues related to possession. The common elements in these cases included:
The pattern indicates that while the builder's stance on offering possession was notable, the acceptance of terms by the complainants had significant weight in the final decisions made against them.
In contrast, the two cases where Alta Vista Info Solutions emerged victorious involved claims related to delay in project completion and possession of plots. Key takeaways from these cases include:
Based on the legal data available, Alta Vista Info Solutions shows a mixed performance in the courtroom, with strengths in their defense during project completion disputes but vulnerabilities in cases regarding delayed possession. Potential buyers should remain informed about the builder’s track record.
With the right level of research and due diligence, potential buyers can make informed decisions when considering Alta Vista Info Solutions or any builder in the real estate market.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Alta Vista Info Solutions Private Limited, which it lost reveals significant insights into the recurring issues the builder faced in its disputes. The following themes have emerged from the case summaries:
In reviewing the common reasons the builder brought cases to court, the frequent trends included a dispute over penalties for delays, contesting the classification of development statuses, and seeking relief from financial repercussions tied to development timelines. Furthermore, the builder often pointed fingers at external factors to justify their delays, indicating a pattern of seeking to deflect responsibility.
However, the consistent reasons why Alta Vista Info Solutions lost these cases could be attributed to several key elements including: a lack of sufficient documentation to support their claims, failure to comply with legal and regulatory mandates, and an evident misunderstanding of land acceptance conditions. Moreover, the court often favored the complainants when evidence suggested they were not adequately informed about the status and implications of accepting the plot 'as is'. This suggests that for buyers considering dealings with Alta Vista Info Solutions, there may be underlying issues in the builder's operational and compliance processes that should be carefully scrutinized.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Alta Vista Info Solutions Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily revolve around common themes such as Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes Over Project Completion, and Regulatory Non-compliance.
Many of the cases involve allegations that the builder did not hand over physical possession of properties within the agreed-upon time frame and claims questioning the builder's status as a 'Promoter'.
Such disputes often arise from the builder asserting its right to the completion timelines set by regulatory authorities, while buyers may claim delays that hinder their possession.
The builder also faced challenges in the form of accusations regarding non-compliance with municipal or governmental directives, particularly underlining their interactions with the Town and Country Planning Department.
The builder commonly brought cases to court to contest penalties and disputes over project delays that were allegedly caused by external factors rather than by negligence or fault on the part of Alta Vista.
The pattern of litigation reveals that disputes are often ignited by miscommunications regarding completion timelines and project status, leading to potential misunderstandings regarding the contractual obligations of both parties.
In essence, the builder’s claim to promote clear communication and its willingness to fulfill its obligations frequently surfaces in these cases.
The reason Alta Vista Info Solutions Private Limited often won these cases can primarily be attributed to insufficient counter-evidence provided by the opposing parties.
In each instance, respondents struggled to substantiate their claims or demonstrate legal breaches by the builder.
Moreover, failure on the part of the opposing parties to adhere to interim directions issued by courts or regulatory authorities further bolstered the builder's position.
The analysis suggests that misunderstandings concerning land classification and project timelines played a central role in the disputes, highlighting the complexities involved in real estate transactions where both parties might not fully grasp the legal implications.
From this analysis, we can infer valuable insights regarding the builder's reputation as well as the broader landscape of the real estate market.
It's crucial to recognize that the legal disputes faced by builders like Alta Vista Info Solutions can stem from unfounded accusations or miscommunications from buyers.
The builder's strong track record of effectively defending against such claims indicates its compliance with industry norms and legal standards, despite the contentious nature of real estate transactions.
For potential buyers, this analysis underscores the importance of making well-informed decisions.
While disputes can undoubtedly arise, understanding the context of such cases can shed light on the builder's reliability.
Buyers should approach claims with caution, ensuring they gather accurate information and not hastily judge a builder's reputation based on isolated incidents.
Proper due diligence can lead to informed decisions that safeguard their investments in the real estate market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!