| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial to ensure you receive quality construction and timely possession of your new home. This blog post delves into A.M. Builders and Promoters, a builder operating in Chhattisgarh, examining their complaint history, legal outcomes, and providing insights for potential buyers.
Overview of A.M. Builders and Promoters
A.M. Builders and Promoters has recorded a total of 4 complaints against them, with 0 cases won and 4 cases lost. While operating solely in the state of Chhattisgarh, their track record raises concerns that prospective buyers should be aware of.
Legal Case Summary
The legal challenges faced by A.M. Builders and Promoters primarily center on delayed possession and incomplete development work, as noted in all four cases.
Common Patterns in Cases
Cases Lost:
- All four instances involved allegations from applicants claiming that the builder delayed possession of flats and failed to complete development work as per the agreement.
- In response, A.M. Builders and Promoters consistently argued that the delay was due to the applicants' failure to pay the remaining dues, suggesting significant disputes around payment completion.
- Ultimately, however, the Authority partially accepted the applicants' claims, indicating that even while there were payment disputes, the builder was not able to satisfactorily fulfill their contractual obligations on time.
Cases Won:
- Interestingly, while there were no cases won in favor of A.M. Builders and Promoters, each case's final verdict directed the non-applicant to complete construction. The Authority's decisions highlight a pattern where the complaints were acknowledged, and the builders were held accountable, albeit in a limited capacity, demonstrating a lack of comprehensive legal victories in favor of the builder.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, A.M. Builders and Promoters show a concerning pattern of performance, particularly in legal disputes. With a total of four cases lost, it is evident that the builder has not successfully defended against claims regarding delays and unfinished work, raising red flags for potential buyers.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder's history, looking for client reviews, past project deliveries, and any legal issues.
- Request Timelines: Be clear about project timelines and ensure they are documented in your purchase agreement.
- Inspect the Work Quality: If possible, visit previous projects completed by the builder to get an idea of their quality and adherence to timelines.
- Payment Transparency: Ensure that the payment schedule is clear and feasible. Aim to avoid disputes over payments that could lead to further complications.
General Advice for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Verify the builder's licenses and certifications.
- Understand Contracts: Read all contracts carefully, noting the fine print regarding timelines, quality specifications, and exit clauses.
- Engage Legal Assistance: Consider hiring a lawyer specializing in real estate to navigate complex agreements and provide protection against potential disputes.
- Connect with Past Clients: Speak with former buyers to understand their experiences and gather insights into the builder's reliability and service.
In conclusion, while A.M. Builders and Promoters have undertaken projects in Chhattisgarh, the alarming trend in their legal disputes suggests that thorough due diligence is essential before entering into any agreements with them.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.M. Builders and Promoters, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the applicants. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Completion of Development Work, and Payment Delays and Their Implications.
The majority of the cases revolved around the claim that the builder had delayed possession of the flats. The applicants consistently stated that the builder had failed to complete the development work as per their agreement, which led to significant delays in delivering property to the buyers. This theme emerged in every case summarized, indicating a systemic issue within the builder's operational capabilities, particularly concerning adherence to timelines and fulfillment of contractual obligations.
The builder's defense often revolved around the assertion that delays were caused by the applicants' failure to pay the remaining amounts owed on their properties. The builder claimed that once full payment was received, the development work would be completed promptly. However, the legal authorities did not accept this defense and emphasized the builder's responsibility to deliver completed units within a reasonable timeframe, regardless of payment disputes.
A pattern that emerges from these cases is that applicants commonly brought claims to court due to the builder's inability to meet project timelines and fulfill agreements. The builders’ frequent attribution of delays to payment issues rather than acknowledging potential mismanagement or insufficient resources indicates a defensive posture that was not supported by the outcomes in court.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a combination of factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely development work, failure to comply with the agreed-upon timelines, and a lack of understanding of their contractual obligations were critical in the decisions made by the authorities. Furthermore, the consistent directive to complete construction and hand over possession within a short timeline after the receipt of remaining payments highlights an expectation that the builder should have been ready to fulfill its commitments much earlier.
In conclusion, the cases against A.M. Builders and Promoters serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. They underline the importance of scrutinizing a builder's reputation, operational efficiency, and previous legal disputes before making a purchase. Buyers should be aware of common triggers for litigation, such as delayed possession and disputes over development work, and should consider these factors when contemplating investments in real estate.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-4-2020-0079 | Chhattisgarh | The applicants, Mr. Rahul Dev Yadav and Mrs. Kirt… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that … | Mrs. Kirti Yadav | A.M. Builders & Pro… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2020-01079/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_3474d860-c56a-4bbe-b710-1a85b8bdb518.pdf |
| 4-4-2020-0080 | Chhattisgarh | The applicants, Shri Gautam Kumar Bera and Smt. S… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that … | Smt. Sangeeta Bera | A.M. Builders & Pro… | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-PRO-2020-01080/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_fa69db22-6675-44a6-b024-2d5a05fb5824.pdf |