| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of real estate, the reputation of builders is often gauged not only by the quality of their projects but also by their legal standing. Amar Adeshwar Infrastructure, operating primarily in Rajasthan, presents a case study worth examining due to its recent legal engagements. In this blog, we will delve into the builder's performance in legal cases, analyze patterns in their complaints, and provide insights for prospective buyers.
Legal Overview
Amar Adeshwar Infrastructure has garnered attention with a total of 2 complaints against them, resulting in a split outcome in legal cases with 1 case won and 1 case lost. Let us explore the particulars of these cases.
Cases Filed Against the Builder
- Case Lost: 1 case
- Respondent Claim: The builder submitted all Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) as per requirements, asserting compliance.
- Final Verdict: The proceedings were discharged, and the case was dropped, indicating a potential …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Amar Adeshwar Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across their legal disputes.
The cases against the builder primarily revolve around three critical themes: non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), project delay violations, and broader regulatory non-compliance issues.
In terms of RERA compliance, the builder faced scrutiny over their adherence to the provisions outlined in the Act. The promoter claimed that they intended to complete projects on a fast track while complying with all regulations; however, the verdict indicated otherwise, highlighting significant violations that warranted penalties.
Project delay violations were another common theme in the cases against the builder. Although the specifics of project delays were not detailed in the summary, the fact that a penalty was imposed suggests that the builder failed to meet project timelines as mandated by RERA and other regulatory …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases predominantly fell into three thematic categories: Regulatory Compliance and QPR Filings, Allegations of Delayed Project Completion, and Disputes Over Contractual Obligations.
In the category of Regulatory Compliance and QPR Filings, many disputes revolved around whether necessary documents, like Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs), were filed appropriately. In this instance, the opposing party claimed that all relevant QPRs had been filed and the builder successfully defended that assertion, leading to the dismissal of proceedings against them. This indicates that builders must adhere strictly to regulatory obligations to mitigate disputes.
Cases associated with Allegations of Delayed Project Completion highlight issues where buyers or regulatory bodies may have felt that the builder was not delivering on time or meeting their contractual obligations. However, the case summaries indicate that the reactions from Amar Adeshwar Infrastructure involved …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!