| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market of Tamil Nadu, potential homebuyers often seek reliable builders with a proven track record. AMARPRAKASH DEVELOPERS Private Limited is one such builder that has garnered attention due to its mixed performance in various legal disputes. This blog will delve into AMARPRAKASH DEVELOPERS' legal battles, highlighting both the challenges faced and the victories achieved.
Overview of Legal Cases Against AMARPRAKASH DEVELOPERS
AMARPRAKASH DEVELOPERS has faced a total of 29 complaints, with a significant imbalance in their legal outcomes. The builder has won 1 case while losing 28 cases, indicating a substantial struggle in meeting buyer expectations and contractual obligations.
Cases Lost
The single case won by the builder involved a complaint regarding the delay in the delivery of a flat and legality surrounding an assignment fee collection. In this instance, the authority judged that the complaint was not maintainable, as the block was completed …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Amarpaksh Developers Private Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operations and the common themes that emerged from these disputes.
The cases could be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, non-compliance with RERA/TNRERA, disputes over payment and interest charges, failure to register projects, penalties for project delays, and incomplete possession and handover disputes.
Many of the complainants sought early possession of their flats, claiming that the builder had failed to deliver units on time. This points to an apparent systemic issue with project timelines and the builder's ability to meet deadlines. There were also frequent disputes related to payments, with builders often claiming that buyers owed interest on delayed payments, and buyers contesting these charges.
Non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Authority (RERA) or its state counterpart, TNRERA, was a recurring theme. Several …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, AMARPRAKASH DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily fall into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Compliance and Fees, and Project Completion Disputes.
- Delayed Possession Claims: Some buyers have questioned the timeline for possession of their flats, claiming delays that have led to financial and emotional distress. In this case, it was argued that possession should have been handed over sooner, but the builder successfully defended the timeline based on the project status.
- Regulatory Compliance and Fees: A notable dispute centered on the legality of the assignment fee collection. Opposing parties have challenged these fees under various legal grounds. However, the builder claimed that these fees were legitimately collected, consistent with regulations established before the new Real Estate Act came into force.
- Project Completion Disputes: The inquiries into the completion …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!