CIN | U51503DL1986PTC023886 |
---|---|
Year Established | 14-Apr-86 |
Address | L-4, GREEN PARK EXTENSION, , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110016 |
Company Status | Private |
In the real estate sector, understanding a builder's legal history can offer valuable insights into their reliability and integrity. In this blog post, we will explore the legal cases associated with Ambience Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Haryana. We'll analyze their complaint record, the outcomes of legal proceedings, and provide useful tips for potential buyers.
Based on the provided data, Ambience Private Limited has experienced challenges in legal compliance, as evidenced by their lost case. Potential buyers should carefully consider this history when evaluating their projects. While there is a successful case showing a positive response to regulatory requirements, the absence of won cases raises concerns about overall reliability.
Selecting a builder is a significant investment decision. By understanding Ambience Private Limited’s background and applying the tips shared in this blog, potential buyers can make informed choices, thereby safeguarding their interests in the vibrant real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ambience Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two critical issues: non-compliance with municipal orders and disputes over project registration.
The theme of non-compliance with municipal orders encompasses the builder's failure to adhere to the necessary legal frameworks surrounding real estate development. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that the builder had not registered their licensed area as required by law. This highlights a pattern of neglect towards regulatory compliance, which was a common trigger for litigation in the cases examined.
The second theme, disputes over project registration, further illustrates the builder's complications with adhering to development regulations. The builder's defense often revolved around their assertion of timely submissions and expired licenses, yet the authority ruled against them, mandating registration before proceeding with sales. This indicates a significant misunderstanding or disregard for the proper procedures regarding project development and sales, leading to legal consequences.
The reasons people brought cases to court against Ambience Private Limited primarily included contesting the builder's operations that were deemed non-compliant with established rules. There was a prevalent pattern of disputing the builder’s actions related to project registration and development, which reflects a lack of due diligence on the builder’s part.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases were rooted in their failure to comply with legal requirements, resulting in insufficient evidence to support their claims. The rulings consistently pointed towards the necessity for Ambience Private Limited to align its development practices with the appropriate regulations, highlighting severe gaps in their operational adherence to law.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERA-PKL-1167-2018 | Haryana | The case was filed against Ambience Private Ltd. … | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Haryana Real Estate… | Ambience Private Li… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NTkwOQ== |