CIN | U51503DL1986PTC023886 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | L-4, GREEN PARK EXTENSION, , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110016 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate sector, understanding a builder's legal history can offer valuable insights into their reliability and integrity. In this blog post, we will explore the legal cases associated with Ambience Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Haryana. We'll analyze their complaint record, the outcomes of legal proceedings, and provide useful tips for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Ambience Private Limited currently has one recorded complaint against them, which they lost. Despite this setback, they are engaged in projects within Haryana, showcasing their involvement in regional development.Legal Case Details
Ambience Private Limited's legal history involves one significant case:- The appellant alleged that the builder did not register their licensed area as mandated by law.
- Respondent's Defense: The builder contended that they had submitted their necessary written submissions on time. They also claimed that their license for developing the colony had expired in July 2014 …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ambience Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two critical issues: non-compliance with municipal orders and disputes over project registration.
The theme of non-compliance with municipal orders encompasses the builder's failure to adhere to the necessary legal frameworks surrounding real estate development. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that the builder had not registered their licensed area as required by law. This highlights a pattern of neglect towards regulatory compliance, which was a common trigger for litigation in the cases examined.
The second theme, disputes over project registration, further illustrates the builder's complications with adhering to development regulations. The builder's defense often revolved around their assertion of timely submissions and expired licenses, yet the authority ruled against them, mandating registration before proceeding with sales. This indicates a significant misunderstanding or disregard for …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!