CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
AMD Estate and Developers Private Limited operates primarily in the state of Haryana. While any real estate investment can be significant, potential buyers must carefully analyze the builder's track record. In this blog, we will explore the available data on AMD Estate and Developers, particularly focusing on their legal history, and how it may impact buyers.
AMD Estate and Developers Private Limited has a reported number of 2 complaints against them. However, concerning their legal disputes, they have lost both cases. This raises questions about their operational practices and customer satisfaction.
Interestingly, despite the builder having no recorded victories in the outcomes of the cases, we see their persistent defense that possession was granted and returns were fulfilled until March 2020. This reflects a defensive strategy to contest complaints rather than proactively addressing client concerns.
Given the information provided, AMD Estate and Developers Private Limited shows several red flags that potential buyers should consider. With all complaints resulting in loss for the builder, this emphasizes a need for caution. The builder's inability to resolve issues internally may lead to escalated disputes, potentially affecting future customers.
While AMD Estate and Developers Private Limited may have projects within Haryana, their legal history raises important questions. Buyers should remain vigilant and well-informed before making any commitments. Choosing a builder with a robust history and strong customer satisfaction is key to ensuring a successful investment in real estate.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against AMD Estate and Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.
The cases highlighted two recurring themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Assured Returns Disputes, along with allegations of Excessive Charges. The majority of the complaints were centered around delays in the possession of commercial units. The complainants expressed frustration not only over the inability to receive their units on time but also over the lack of communication regarding the status of their investments.
A pattern emerged where the builder consistently claimed to have provided possession of the units, asserting that the delays were either exaggerated or caused by circumstances beyond their control. However, the authority did not accept this defense, suggesting that there may have been insufficient evidence provided by the builder to support their claims, or that the definition of "possession" may have differed between the parties involved.
Additionally, there were Assured Returns Disputes, where the builder failed to pay the promised returns on investment after a certain period (in this case, March 2020). This indicates a serious concern about the builder's financial stability and their ability to meet contractual obligations, which likely contributed to the losses in court.
Excessive Charges Allegations also played a crucial role in these cases. The builder was accused of charging amounts that were not agreed upon in the original contracts, leading the authority to direct the builder to cease this practice. This raises questions regarding the builder's transparency and ethical standards when dealing with buyers.
In conclusion, the common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include:
These patterns point to a troubled builder with significant operational and ethical issues, which potential buyers should be acutely aware of before making any investment decisions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!