| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is pivotal for any prospective homeowner or investor. One such builder, AMEYA DEVELOPERS, based in Maharashtra, has shown a significant presence in the market. However, as with any builder, the collection of customer feedback and the legal landscape surrounding them offers critical insights. This post delves into the legal record of AMEYA DEVELOPERS, analyzing the complaints, cases won and lost, and providing guidance for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
AMEYA DEVELOPERS has faced a total of 7 complaints, with a notable record of winning 5 cases and losing 2. This balance presents a rather favorable outlook on their dealings, yet the number of complaints may raise an eyebrow for potential clients.
Cases Won by AMEYA DEVELOPERS
A detailed examination of the cases that the builder filed and won reveals a pattern. The common thread in the majority …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ameya Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across the board. The cases can primarily be grouped into two common themes: Jurisdictional Claims and Sustainability of Orders.
The first theme, Jurisdictional Claims, encompasses the builder's repeated assertions that the Adjudicating Officer lacked the jurisdiction to decide on the complaints raised. In both cases, the builder claimed that the impugned order was not sustainable in law, indicating a fundamental disagreement with the legal basis of the complaints themselves. This highlights a pattern where the builder commonly contested the authority of the judicial or quasi-judicial bodies presiding over their cases.
The second theme, Sustainability of Orders, reflects the outcomes of the cases where the builder's appeals were partly allowed, resulting in the impugned orders being set aside. This suggests that while the builder was unsuccessful in outright dismissing the complaints, there …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around disputes related to the sustainability of impugned orders issued by adjudication authorities, jurisdiction claims regarding the powers of the Adjudicating Officer, and requests for relief against adverse decisions. Each theme presents a unique set of challenges faced by the builder.
The first prevalent theme is the 'Sustainability of Impugned Orders.' In these cases, AMEYA DEVELOPERS contested orders made against them, seeking to overturn decisions they argued were not legally valid or sustainable. This pattern indicates a proactive approach by the builder to ensure fair treatment under the law and to mitigate any potentially damaging rulings.
Another notable theme is 'Adjudication Authority Disputes.' The builder consistently contended that the Adjudicating Officer lacked jurisdiction in certain cases. This common defense strategy suggests that AMEYA DEVELOPERS is vigilant about the division of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!