AMR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Introduction

Welcome to our detailed evaluation of the AMR Housing Development Corporation, a builder operating in Karnataka. This assessment is based on their complaint history, legal case results, and the implications for potential buyers.

Overview of AMR Housing Development Corporation

AMR Housing Development Corporation has a limited operational footprint, focusing its projects solely in Karnataka. Despite this concentration, the builder has faced significant scrutiny, as evidenced by the number of complaints lodged against them.

Complaint Analysis

• Total Complaints Filed: 2
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 2

This stark contrast highlights a troubling trend; AMR Housing Development Corporation has not won any cases against them despite two formal complaints. The outcomes of these cases reveal serious concerns about the builder's compliance with its contractual obligations to customers.

Legal Case Details

Case Summaries

1. Case One:
   • Appellant's Claim: The complainant sought compensation for delays in the unregistered project 'AMR Oaks' led by Manjunath Reddy.
   • Respondent's Claim: The developer failed to complete the project on time, collected payments, and neglected to register the project with the relevant authorities.
   • Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the developer to pay delay compensation and associated costs.
2. Case Two:
   • Appellant's Claim: A complainant indicated that after paying 90% of the total price for a flat in the 'AMR Oaks' project, they canceled their booking but the developer did not issue a refund.
   • Respondent's Claim: The builder did not respond to the complaint.
   • Final Verdict: The authority upheld the refund claim of Rs. 36,08,238 plus interest, mandating the builder to return the amount.

Analysis of Loss Patterns

The two cases against AMR Housing Development Corporation reveal common factors that led to losses:

• Failure to Register Projects: In one instance, the lack of registration for the 'AMR Oaks' project seems to have been a critical element that worked against the builder. This lack of compliance likely undermined any defense from the builder.
• Inadequate Communication: In the second case, the builder's failure to respond to the complaint indicates a lack of engagement and responsibility. This absence likely contributed to the judgment against them, as it demonstrated disregard for consumer concerns.

Analysis of Win Patterns

Interestingly, despite the zero-win record for AMR Housing, both cases resulted in losses, highlighting a consistent pattern of unfavorable outcomes in their dealings. Hence, no discernible win patterns exist that suggest favorable outcomes in claims against them.

Conclusion

The track record of AMR Housing Development Corporation raises significant red flags for prospective buyers. With no cases won and both complaints resulting in losses for the builder, potential customers should approach with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Investigate the builder's reputation and complaint history thoroughly. Look for information about project registrations and consumer reviews.
2. Verify Project Registration: Ensure that any planned purchase is linked to registered projects, as this signals compliance with local authorities.
3. Documentation: Keep a clear record of all payments and agreements, particularly concerning refunds and projected timelines.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Research Background: Always check for complaints and legal histories when evaluating a builder.
2. Consult with Previous Buyers: Speak to others who have purchased from the builder to understand their experiences firsthand.
3. Understand the Contract: Be clear on what the contract stipulates, especially regarding completion dates and refund policies.

When investing in a property, it is crucial to review and analyze a builder’s performance diligently before making any financial commitments.