No Logo Available

ANANT RAJ LIMITED

4.0/5 (31 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana, Rajasthan
CINL45400HR1985PLC021622
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressPLOT NO. CP-1, SECTOR-8 IMT MANESAR NA GURGAON Gurgaon HR 122051 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-competitive real estate market, potential buyers must perform diligent research before making investments. One such builder, ANANT RAJ LIMITED, warrants close examination due to its legal history. This blog will delve into the builder's complaints and legal outcomes to provide insightful analysis for prospective buyers.

Legal Standing of ANANT RAJ LIMITED

ANANT RAJ LIMITED currently holds a total of 31 complaints lodged against it, with outcomes reflecting a challenging legal environment. Of these, 6 cases were won by the builder, while an overwhelming 25 cases resulted in losses. With projects primarily in Haryana and Rajasthan, understanding the nature of these legal disputes is essential for informed decision-making.

Overview of Legal Cases

Cases Won by ANANT RAJ LIMITED

The builder successfully won 6 cases, showcasing some favorable outcomes for its operations:

  1. Settlement-Based Resolutions: The builder's legal team was able to secure some wins through settlements, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-Compliance with RERA Disputes over Payment and Refunds Settlements and Withdrawals Possession Delays Attributed to Buyers

Analysis of the cases filed against Anant Raj Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), disputes over payment and refunds, settlements and withdrawals, and possession delays attributed to buyers.

The most recurring theme is related to Delayed Possession Claims. In numerous cases, the complainants asserted that the builder failed to hand over possession of their flats within the stipulated timeline, which created a legal obligation for the builder to pay delayed possession charges. The builder consistently attributed these delays to circumstances beyond their control or to buyers' failure to make timely payments. However, the verdicts generally favored the complainants, emphasizing the need for builders to adhere to established timelines.

Non-Compliance with RERA is another significant theme. There were cases where the builder was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Settlement Agreement Cases

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder ANANT RAJ LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around the theme of Settlement Agreement Cases, where disputes between the parties were resolved amicably.

In this specific instance, the builder claimed that the parties had come to a mutual understanding regarding their disagreement and, as a result, sought the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. The respondent, acknowledging this settlement, had no objection to the dismissal of the appeal, indicating a clear alignment between both parties in resolving their issues without prolonged litigation.

It is evident from the case summary that the builder tends to bring cases to court not necessarily against legitimate grievances but rather to clarify misunderstandings or to officially document the resolution of disputes after informal agreements have been reached. This pattern shows that disputes may arise out of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Dismissals for Non-appearance Jurisdictional Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ANANT RAJ LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes can be grouped into several common themes based on the type of complaints raised by the opposing parties.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: Some complaints involved allegations of delays in possession of the allotted flats, where buyers sought refunds and interest due to their grievances. However, the builder successfully defended against such claims by arguing that the projects were complete and that outstanding amounts were due from the complainants.
  2. Dismissals for Non-appearance: A significant number of cases were dismissed due to the non-appearance of the complainant, which indicates a lack of sufficient proof or commitment from the opposing parties. The legal process necessitates active participation, and the complainants’ failure to appear ultimately led to the dismissal of their cases.
  3. Jurisdictional Disputes: In one …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review